This post may contain Adult content.
AdultRandom
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Circumcision, less is more

Circumcision is proof that sometimes less is more. His loss is my gain. Circumcision makes the man's penis less sensitive. That might lower the upper limit of how much sensation and enjoyment they can get from their penis, but at the same time, they'll last longer. The foreskin acts as a natural lubricant, gliding back and forth. This can be useful if the guy is rather large, but for the most part, the lack of a foreskin and the direct stimulation help to make him feel bigger. Scars can be sexy, especially when they undeniably mark that a penis made a sacrifice for my benefit. Lastly, a nice tight circumcision will make it a little harder for the guy to wank. That just forces him to give a little more attention to his partner to make sure she helps him get off. Circumcision is the perfect sexual equalizer. Men's bits are on the outside, easily accessible and easy to work with. Making it a tiny bit harder for men to get themselves off makes it just a tiny bit more likely they'll put in the effort to get their partners off. Circumcision, less for him, but more for his partner.
Top | New | Old
gogglewoggle · 31-35, M
I agree with you - my foreskin gets in the way in some respects and I can well understand a woman's preference for her partner to give her more attention/masturbate less. Plus it looks better. Would you make in compulsory, @curiousGirl89 ?
DViper97 · 51-55, M
Sounds cool. I’m cut but you never really think about unless someone brings it up.
JoeXP · 56-60, M
I have a full tight circumcision. I wouldn’t have thought it affected penis sensation during insertion or manual stimulation, but I’ve nothing to compare it with.
DDaverde · 61-69, M
Nice !! 😊
Bill1372 · 51-55, M
Well said
Docdon23 · M
Sad--this is totally unnecessary genital mutilation. Why not do it on baby girls as well? It was pushed in the late 1800s by Kellogg, a religious fanatic who wanted to stop boys and girls from masturbating or feeling pleasure. Yes, girls too. It was done for religious reasons by some cultures but never for any medical good reason. sad that this mutilation is so casually discussed here. let's casually discuss doing it to baby girls then.
Bill1372 · 51-55, M
It definitely more sanitary being cut
Docdon23 · M
@swirlie I wonder...should we remove eyelids? Are eyes dirty? It is the same skin as foreskin...what about our tongues (it has a frenulum as well)...was reading an article that explained in the US the medical community used to see circumcision as preventing masturbation, but when that did not work they reworked their fake message to cleanliness--it is a multibillion dollar industry cutting off part of baby boy's penises for no valid medical reason. The article also explained that in European countries with very low circumcision rates they do not have any increase in penile diseases or issues, in fact have fewer because they do not have medical complications of circumcision!! This is a sham!!
swirlie · 31-35
@Docdon23
My ancestry is Scandinavian and the ONLY time a guy is circumcised in Scandinavian countries is if he has a medical complication that would be life threatening to him if circumcision was not accomplished.

I went to school in Canada and while in high school and university, I had a preferential bias for guys who were not circumcised. This is because I was raised and educated with the understanding that foreskin is normal, in addition to the fact that I actually like it's appearance and texture.

Others in my social circles were not excluded from those circles because they had been circumcised at birth, despite the vast majority of men in North America being circumcised.

Every summer when my sisters and I would go over to Scandinavia to visit with cousins, I learned the meaning of 'open relationships' when I was a teenager. Every guy I ever met in Sweden, Denmark or The Netherlands was uncircumcised and when I raised issue with circumcision one time, my female cousins and their friends admitted to me that they had never actually seen a guy who'd been circumcised and so they questioned me for even asking about it.
Bill1372 · 51-55, M
swirlie · 31-35
I totally disagree with every assertion you've made in your post.
Docdon23 · M
@swirlie Thank you...perhaps some do not realize that 70% of the men in the world are intact, and that the women who know them think THAT looks better--people like what they are used to. Certainly cutting the most sensitive, pleasurable skin off a baby boy's body for "looks better" reasons is absurd! I think a trimmed labia and clitoral hood look better...
swirlie · 31-35
@Docdon23
True, 70% of the men in the world are fully intact, but 80% of all males born in the USA are circumcised for no apparent reason.

I was born into a Scandinavian cultural lifestyle and I was educated to understand that foreskin is normal on a guy and that circumcision is only performed on males in Scandinavian countries who are having serious medical issues which would otherwise call for circumcision.
Docdon23 · M
@swirlie yes--I totally agree with you.
Docdon23 · M
I hope you find a boyfriend who insist you get circumcised...
1490wayb · 56-60, M
funny how hands and genitals in perfect spot allowing for masturbation...what is a tight circumcision??
curiousGirl89 · 36-40, F
@1490wayb There are different types of circumcision. One parameter is how much skin they remove. If they remove a lot of skin, leaving less, the result is a tight circumcision, leaving minimal skin mobility. If they remove less skin, that is a loose circumcision, leaving more skin mobility.
1490wayb · 56-60, M
@curiousGirl89 i seem have a nice large head is all i know
curiousaboy · 31-35, M
@curiousGirl89 Then why they undergo loose circumcision. what's the purpose of cutting bit of the skin.

 
Post Comment