This post may contain Adult content.
AdultRandom
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Circumcision, less is more

Circumcision is proof that sometimes less is more. His loss is my gain. Circumcision makes the man's penis less sensitive. That might lower the upper limit of how much sensation and enjoyment they can get from their penis, but at the same time, they'll last longer. The foreskin acts as a natural lubricant, gliding back and forth. This can be useful if the guy is rather large, but for the most part, the lack of a foreskin and the direct stimulation help to make him feel bigger. Scars can be sexy, especially when they undeniably mark that a penis made a sacrifice for my benefit. Lastly, a nice tight circumcision will make it a little harder for the guy to wank. That just forces him to give a little more attention to his partner to make sure she helps him get off. Circumcision is the perfect sexual equalizer. Men's bits are on the outside, easily accessible and easy to work with. Making it a tiny bit harder for men to get themselves off makes it just a tiny bit more likely they'll put in the effort to get their partners off. Circumcision, less for him, but more for his partner.
Top | New | Old
DViper97 · 51-55, M
Sounds cool. I’m cut but you never really think about unless someone brings it up.
JoeXP · 56-60, M
I have a full tight circumcision. I wouldn’t have thought it affected penis sensation during insertion or manual stimulation, but I’ve nothing to compare it with.
DDaverde · 61-69, M
Nice !! 😊
Docdon23 · M
Sad--this is totally unnecessary genital mutilation. Why not do it on baby girls as well? It was pushed in the late 1800s by Kellogg, a religious fanatic who wanted to stop boys and girls from masturbating or feeling pleasure. Yes, girls too. It was done for religious reasons by some cultures but never for any medical good reason. sad that this mutilation is so casually discussed here. let's casually discuss doing it to baby girls then.
I totally disagree with every assertion you've made in your post.
Docdon23 · M
@swirlie Thank you...perhaps some do not realize that 70% of the men in the world are intact, and that the women who know them think THAT looks better--people like what they are used to. Certainly cutting the most sensitive, pleasurable skin off a baby boy's body for "looks better" reasons is absurd! I think a trimmed labia and clitoral hood look better...
@Docdon23
True, 70% of the men in the world are fully intact, but 80% of all males born in the USA are circumcised for no apparent reason.

I was born into a Scandinavian cultural lifestyle and I was educated to understand that foreskin is normal on a guy and that circumcision is only performed on males in Scandinavian countries who are having serious medical issues which would otherwise call for circumcision.
Docdon23 · M
@swirlie yes--I totally agree with you.
1490wayb · 56-60, M
funny how hands and genitals in perfect spot allowing for masturbation...what is a tight circumcision??
curiousGirl89 · 36-40, F
@1490wayb There are different types of circumcision. One parameter is how much skin they remove. If they remove a lot of skin, leaving less, the result is a tight circumcision, leaving minimal skin mobility. If they remove less skin, that is a loose circumcision, leaving more skin mobility.
1490wayb · 56-60, M
@curiousGirl89 i seem have a nice large head is all i know

 
Post Comment