Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Dr. Berg Gets Censored (Silenced)

Look before anyone says it, I recognize that private companies can do things that they choose to but at the same time, you gotta question the fine line between private companies using propaganda for their own gain and where the private company's freedom ends or begins. I think that's honestly a good discussion to have. Here's my opinion, I think if it's demonstrably false and can be proven to be such, misinformation should always be fought against to take action accordingly but if there's somewhat of a doubt, I don't think there should be any censorship and there should be honest discussion over it.

Apparently YouTube and Google have been trying to censor alternative health information for awhile like as in alternative diets other than the one recommended by the vegan 7th Day Adventist "scientists" idea of the food pyramid and food suggestions. And now they've taken steps into doing so. This is really terrible to me because it's abusive. Think about it, you're gaslighting millions of people into telling them that "you know what's best" for my own body.

The standard food pyramid says eat so and so servings of grains and if I found a diet that says "here's why grains may be bad" and I honestly have gotten around to feeling better without grains, making me eat grains just because you have an issue with so and so diet is abusive towards me. Just because you think everyone should have grains doesn't mean we all should.

Keto has been studied for instance and was started by John Hopkins Hospital. Yes it's extreme and was only intended for people with seizures but there's lots of body of evidence that it helps with neurological conditions because scientists think it makes the body produce more of certain neurotransmitters that are absent in these conditions.

Yes there's pros and cons to literally EVERY diet out there but that's precisely why no one should govern anyone on anyone's diet is because I make that choice, I don't need you to make that choice for me. It's nothing but propaganda anyways as seed oils were introduced and then they demonized saturated fat because saturated fat was used in fast food chains before seed oils. They had no choice but to demonize it.

I also know that a large body of scientific literature has been done by 7th Day Adventists who are specifically vegetarian and vegan so there's a clear conflict of interest and to have that conflict of interest is immoral.

Here is a link in which science isn't all black and white. A tribe that has a highly inflammatory bodies due to parasites, all meat diet but also the best heart health in the world and the lowest levels cholesterol ever seen:

https://news.asu.edu/20170317-discoveries-despite-meat-heavy-diet-indigenous-tribe-has-world%E2%80%99s-healthiest-hearts-%E2%80%94-why

Obviously doctors don't know everything, in most disease and in many psychiatric conditions are literally listed as "causes unknown." They literally don't know the causes and as Dr. Berg states, if you don't know the cause then how can you elect yourself as knowing the answer?

[media=https://youtu.be/ETonDtzkETw]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
Medicine is a complex field, often more art than science. Even as a physician, I often have to be careful with what I read and hear. There is the old comment caveat emptor, and in medium cone you, the patient, do need to be careful.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@samueltyler2 Yeah there's a lot of bias though so I'm concerned. Like there's some stuff I've checked out that could be considered alternative health that's actually worked for me. There's verified actual doctors who run clinical establishments against mainstream public opinion.

Like my hands were all cut up, let's put it this way, you can see the inner layers of skin hanging there and it was like that for about 7 years. When I cut out grains, my hands healed and has stayed healed since. If I go back on the diet I was on, my skin gets thin and brittle for some reason. Now if I talked to a standard practitioner they would tell me it's just genetics and there's nothing that can be done. I'm kinda concerned cos this limit of information will not help others like me who needed it. I think they think they're well intentioned but they come across as bullies and dismissing people who have autoimmune conditions and other things going on, which makes them seem like they are bullying people who don't go with their dietary recommendations.

Half of the studies we got are because of 7th Day Adventists and some vegan activists who have managed to invade the medical field with open biases since they think black and white about things.

It's honestly kind of disgusting they are even considering doing that and to be honest, I was never one to go down the anti vaccine route or those kind of routes since I got four shots and stuff, but like now I'm not so sure if I can trust medical authorities with them trying to limit new information.

It does make it seem like they're trying to hide something and kind of wins the favor of alternative health for me I think. I just think that right now, with trying to limit how people heal themselves is just suspicious.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@SatanBurger there is an accepted field called complimentary and alternative medicine. There are medical schools which have such departments. As long as there is no risk, and possible benefits than why not try. There is research as to what works and what doesn't. It has always been, and still is, the concept of risk:benefit.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@samueltyler2 Yeah I just don't get how a small minority can dictate public health information like limitation of what people see and silencing others. Another thing I don't like is that when you actually go to these videos things make sense. Like I think in one of the categories that's banned with what Graylight listed below was best brain foods.

And really Dr. Berg stresses on omega 3 and the like which has long since been proven to be a brain food so for that to be classed as alternative medicine and can't be talked about is just kind of nuts.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@SatanBurger somf of what is posted is dangerous. I am fit free speech, but not when the crazies announce things that are just not true. I am not smart enough to suggest an approach that allows for free exchange of ideas, but avoids posting really dangerous stuff.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@SatanBurger when I took omega 3, my cholesterol skyrocketed. It isn't supposed to happen, but it do id.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@samueltyler2 Well all I know is that neurologists have spoke about things good for your brain and stuff like that. That's kinda what I'm talking about, we should be able to hear from all sorts of authorities and not just 7th Day Adventist ones.