Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
robb65 · 56-60, M
No, but my guess is that we will never get to the bottom of it because too many people have an interest in covering their involvement. China is not about to admit they had anything to do with it, they even hinted that"MAYBE" we should be looking at the US military. There's really little doubt at this point that we were involved with the lab at Wuhan and that they were doing "gain of function research". We know that this funding was supposed to have ended under Obama but somehow they managed to fund it anyway.
Meanwhile it has also leaked out that a British scientist petitioned the government there for funds to "vaccinate" some bats in a cave (he also had ties to a company in the US). They never received those funds but it is unknown whether or not those experiments were carried out with funds from somewhere else.
Want to guess who was screaming the loudest that it could not have leaked out of a lab? Scientist with ties to Wuhan, who knew full well there was "gain of function" research going on there.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@robb65 Why this strain?

Every single year, new flu strains evolve. New bacteria and viruses make the jump from animals in the wild to humans. New species of bacteria are discovered, old diseases surge back after contact with the wild.

Why is this strain the "conspiracy strain?" We can bioengineer near-impossible to detect agent that can take out whole villages. We need nothing new to decimate the world population. And what lame-ass nation released a low-medium stain (historically speaking) with so much available at the fingertips? And which nation wins when everyone else is dead? What would even be the reason for a pandemic? Keeping in mind we can't manage flight schedules, we are managing a pandemic of epic proportion with secrecy and continued success. Right.

People get sick. They die. In this case, they died from a brand new stain unknown previously to man. You know ho we know? There's nothing in the research about it. We can't engineer what we don't have the building blocks for.
This all has an upside, by the way: the vaccines are now being extrapolated and developed for Alzheimer's' cognitive function issue, other infections and even AIDS. But I'm sure no one will question those.
robb65 · 56-60, M
@Graylight It could very well have been a different strain. It could have even been a totally different virus. There's even reason to believe that at the very least they were wanting to experiment with things much more nasty than covid that would have had a much higher death toll. This just happened to be what managed to escape. I'm not convinced it was intentional, maybe it was incompetence.
What I am certain of is that there are people with connections to that lab, and who were personally involved in petitioning the US government as well as the UK government for funds for research of this nature and at the very least should have suspected that covid could have possibly escaped from that lab, and yet these same people tried to point investigators away from Wuhan.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9653613/British-doctor-Peter-Daszak-worked-Wuhan-scientists-secret-plan-stop-lab-leak-theory.html
Graylight · 51-55, F
@robb65
here's even reason to believe that at the very least they were wanting to experiment with things much more nasty than covid

Plague.
Smallpox.
Ebola Virus.
Marburg Hemorrhagic Fever.
Anthrax.
Clostridium Botulinum Toxin.
Hantavirus.

We have so much more than Covid. Things that can kill in hours, that cause a person to bleed from every cell and orifice, odorless and tasteless gasses, powders that take less than a thimble-full to infect an entire airliner.

Your information and your source are both incorrect. This can be discovered through any number of reputable sources.