This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
BlueVeins · 22-25
because that money was acquired by exploiting natural resources, which should be considered the joint inheretance of the nation they belong to.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
BlueVeins · 22-25
@AnnSteve from an organizational perspective, it makes sense to have property rights over natural resources, but not a moral one. Natural resources aren't made or earned; they were kinda just there when we got here and we built our society upon them. If we're to consider ourselves a free society and not a feudal state, we have to take a step back and say that any economic system that relies on the idea of a man owning a river or forest or the air we breathe has got to be taken with a gigantic grain of salt.