Should Meghan be extradited and placed at Her Majesty's Pleasure in The Tower of London ?

@bijouxbroussard I think one of the most interesting things I heard him say (I haven't seen the whole interview) was how felt trapped within the family himself. He kinda intimated that he was relieved to be given an excuse to escape , even though the circumstances of it all must have been quite traumatic.

@bijouxbroussard just saying but.. the queen has expressed time and time again her sadness that they have chosen to walk away and repeatedly that they remain her family.. And I can't help thinking that if they really want to be left alone then shouting about it on Oprah Winfrey's show is hardly in keeping?
Prince Charles has made it clear that he WILL still give him money.. but since the rest of his money would come from British taxes and he's decided he no longer wants that role and he has said he wants to earn his own money.. perhaps it's right? But definitely Charles has said he will still support him.

PS Harry has also expressed a lot.. how he will miss a) his family and b) his duties, many of which he personally cared about. He has stated that he wanted still to keep those thing and didn't want to step away entirely.. I think these are the kinds of things that perhaps make people wonder how influenced he is by his wife who is quite a savvy woman.

@Adaydreambeliever They also said they weren’t given a lot of options in terms of being even “part time” royals. But this was the attitude Meghan was dealing with. Maybe as a person of color I can relate to why she’d be uncomfortable with it...

[quote][b] ROYAL RACISM: A shocking part of the interview came when Meghan claimed her son, Archie, was banned from being a prince before he was even born due to concerns over how 'dark' he would be. Without a royal title, the baby would be left without police protection. Meghan shared that Harry had relayed the information to her based on conversations he had with other members of the family but refused to say which family members had made the comments or ultimately decided Archie could not be a prince. 'In those months when I was pregnant, all around this same time, we have in tandem, the conversation of "He won't be given security, he's not going to be given a title," and also concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he's born,' Meghan said but refused to name names. 'I think that would be very damaging to them. That was relayed to me from Harry. Those were conversations that family had with him'. It was revealed on Monday morning thatHarry told Oprah behind the scenes that it was not The Queen or Prince Philip who had concerns over Archie's skin tone.[/b][/quote]

@bijouxbroussard Archie is not a prince based on line of succession, not his heritage, as set down by George V more than 100years ago. He will be a Prince when the current monarch dies and the line of succession moves up one place.

@meJess You obviously didn’t see the interview. The family wants him specifically excluded.

@bijouxbroussard One person's narrative versus the title lineage set down 100 years ago? There would have to be a royal proclamation to change things.

@meJess Again, this is the point, the “firm” wants to change things specifically for [b]Archie[/b]. I get that you wouldn’t credit Meghan, but why would Harry lie about it ? This is [b]his[/b] heritage being denied his son.

@bijouxbroussard I didn't see the show, but I understood that Meghan said it about him being denied a title and Harry didn't contradict her. If that's the case then it's not the same as confirming it. They both refused to name who made the comment about colour and in what circumstances. I am not saying it didn't happen, I am saying that the claim about not being allowed to be a Prince is rubbish because he isn't entitled yet and Harry would know that.

@meJess But what Meghan stressed was that they told her that the security protection only came with the [b]title[/b]. And then there’s the fact that the rules seemed to have been changed specifically for [b]Archie[/b]. Yeah, I’d want to know why, too. Then, there’s the conversation about family members’ concerns that Archie might be “too dark”. Did you notice that Harry didn’t contradict [b]that[/b], either ? Although he wouldn’t give the person’s name, which I totally understand. If someone like Charles or William was revealed to have said something like that, it would affect how they were viewed by people of color throughout the Commonwealth—and the world, really.

@bijouxbroussard I can't answer what people say they were told, or thought they were told or maybe misunderstood. Security protection is provided to prominent state persons in the UK and when travelling abroad, but not when moving permanently. That was discussed between the US Canadian and UK governments at length when they moved the first time so it should be well known. What is prominent is open to question but leaving the UK permanently means no more UK security.