Top | Newest First | Oldest First
CestManan · 46-50, F
Maybe a small bit as a public relations stunt.
Tobacco companies don;t give the wart hairs off a rat's ass if people get cancer
Tobacco companies don;t give the wart hairs off a rat's ass if people get cancer
Seewhoitis · 56-60, M
@CestManan Hahahaha. So funny.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
CestManan · 46-50, F
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
If I am recalling correctly: I think when the initial lawsuit happened a bunch of tobacco companies had to put money into a research fund. And a few companies have funded some independent studies. But I don't know if any tobacco companies regularly pay a portion of their profits to research anymore.
CestManan · 46-50, F
@CleverFunnyNameGoesHere Only if ordered by the court.
I do not know why the feds trip anyways, not like they aren't making bank off tobacco taxes.
I do not know why the feds trip anyways, not like they aren't making bank off tobacco taxes.
@CestManan Part of the reason the government has an issue with it is that second-hand smoke is more detrimental in and of itself than the filtered smoke that goes into a smoker's lungs, so people who are around cigarette smoke but do not smoke are getting sick/cancer more frequently than smokers. Frequently these long-term illnesses make the ill individual unable to work which makes them reliant on Medicaid/Medicare which is paid for by taxes.
GypsyMiss · 46-50, F
I almost lost my mouthful when I read this. Yes, I’m sure they give a teeny, tiny amount to cancer research, just like pharma companies divert 80% of their profits into R&D (as though they should be congratulated on coming up on new ways to make money 🙄)