Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Here is a thought, why don't we instead quarantine the elderly and those most prone to die from the virus instead?

and we team up to provide them with their necessary needs to survive?

Instead of quarantining the whole world and causing major economic impacts why not quarantine those most voulnerable.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Ironicman · 56-60, M

What age is elderly?

Adec757 · 51-55, M

@Ironicman 65 plus may be?

dark548 · M

@Ironicman what ever the CDC says is the most impacted age with higher risks of mortality.

Ironicman · 56-60, M

@dark548 which is?

Ironicman · 56-60, M

@Adec757 should a 64 year old go out then?

Adec757 · 51-55, M

@Ironicman only as a rule of thumb.... and would include those with underlying health issues.

Ironicman · 56-60, M

@Adec757 in the UK, to date, we've only received advice and guidelines with little or no enforcement. Our Governments strategy to tackle containment has been vague from the outset causing panic and needless anxiety. I have a feeling London and the UK will soon surpass Italy and others on fatalities.