Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Here is a thought, why don't we instead quarantine the elderly and those most prone to die from the virus instead?

and we team up to provide them with their necessary needs to survive?

Instead of quarantining the whole world and causing major economic impacts why not quarantine those most voulnerable.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Anonymartyr · M

They already were since these people, like myself, rarely get out of the home anyway.

dark548 · M

@Anonymartyr healthy people bring you the food and necessities while practicing hygiene. That way we reduce the # of death which is happening mostly to the most voulnerable.

We save lives for those most prone and we keep the economy going.

because how practical is to stop the spread of a virus?

It's all over the world, are we really going to stop this thing dead in it's tracks?

Anonymartyr · M

@dark548 Nobody brings me food, I have to push my walker for miles twice a month to get a little food from the food banks. none of it is healthy for me but I have no options.it doesn't matter if we stop this virus, there will be others and like some in the past, some in the future will be much worse than this. The worst viruses in the past did not have internet to get them hyped into such a hysteria, but they do from now on. This virus has made future viruses all the worse because people will now panic every time someone exhibits allergy symptoms from pollen.