This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
4meAndyou · F
It's rubbish. Your intelligence quotient is a measure of YOUR intelligence...usually inaccurate anyway, because test results are so easily skewed by factors like nervousness, sleep deprivation, hunger, fear of taking tests, age, and so on.
Since humans are of all races, and the intelligence quotient is a measure of each individual human's intelligence, measuring by race is simply rubbish.
Since humans are of all races, and the intelligence quotient is a measure of each individual human's intelligence, measuring by race is simply rubbish.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 31-35, M
@4meAndyou it's inaccurate by I think five points in any direction they said. That skew has already been accounted for and will be presented to you by a reputable test
4meAndyou · F
@Jackaloftheazuresand I will give you some food for thought. My brother and I were measured for intelligence at the same time. My brother was 9 years old than I, and I believe I was about 8 years old at the time. My mother had a friend who was a school teacher who wanted to practice administering the test.
At age 8, I was in 3rd grade. Do you think the test measured accurately someone who was 17 years old, a senior in high school, and someone who was still learning how to read?
At age 8, I was in 3rd grade. Do you think the test measured accurately someone who was 17 years old, a senior in high school, and someone who was still learning how to read?
Jackaloftheazuresand · 31-35, M
@4meAndyou Yes because it gave your relative intelligence, IQ is subject to change. It's all about reasoning ability and if you can mold your neural abilities you can change your number



