Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

If one is using the singular they, should it be "they were" or "they was?"

Poll - Total Votes: 20
They were: "They was" just sounds wrong.
They was: You use "was" for singular.
Show Results
You can only vote on one answer.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Keepitsimple · 51-55, F
They were. I don’t know, I guess it’s where I live. They was just sounds like they live in the back woods or something. Guess it’s just my English drilled into me or something.
DunningKruger · 61-69, M
@Keepitsimple Sure, because they is traditionally plural. However, if you use it as a singular pronoun, referring to an individual of indeterminate sex, shouldn't it take was, which is the singular verb tense?
Keepitsimple · 51-55, F
It sounds so weird...just totally too southern for me I guess. Even if it is proper I couldn’t bring myself to say it.@DunningKruger
joesand99 · 41-45, M
@DunningKruger That is the issue. They is not a "a singular pronoun, referring to an individual of indeterminate sex" It is just bad English and while I understand why some want to use that, I refuse to just speak bad English because someone wants to try to identify with something that is their wish and not based on anything else. I don't judge others and don't want them to judge me OR impose their beliefs on me by trying to make me use that bad English. If you are male you are male and if you are female you are female. I will call you whatever you want but using they is just silly to me.