Don Lemon of CNN says that Jesus wasn't White. Do you agree?

Caucasian and white aren't quite the same thing. A person can be very dark of skin, but if their eyes do not have an epicanthic fold, and if their hair is of the straight variety, they are classified as Caucasian. People from India are considered to be Caucasion, as are most Hispanics, and so on.

This picture of how Jesus may have looked was featured in Popular Mechanics magazine:

https://news.artnet.com/art-world/jesus-face-forensic-anthropology-art-392823

Please note that the medical artist created this portrait as a composite of three skulls from the same area where Jesus was born, and that many of the men of that area were similar in appearance...so, while this is definitely NOT Jesus he would have appeared similar. I am sure he was much more handsome...LOL!!!

There was a story at the time that Jesus father was a Roman soldier named Pantera. So he was half-Italian, half-Mediterranean Jew, and could have been light-skinned.

Jesus was the son of a god, people need to stop thinking he follows any kind of rules

@SW-User He was Swedish. Of course he was white.

Jesus’ skin color is a matter of zero importance to me. Albino or as black as night, it does not alter the message. I try to avoid getting tangled up in ‘how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?’ debates. There is real work to be done. When I see God, I’ll know, and that’s enough.

Come on does anybody take anything he says seriously it's no accident his last name is lemon

One of these or all of these represent what Jesus looked like on earth. Or none of them.

Works for CNN, low ratings on CNN anything for publicity

The US Census is your guide?

So was Muhammad, Islam says he was white too while being born in the Arabic peninsula. Doesn't add up.

yes he was white, look at the paintings in the churches

he wasn't.

nor are any of the other jesus's i know.


get over it folks.

If you want to put Jesus on the US Census, that's your business.