So we hear all the hate about Trump, what do y'all think of his wife?

@BlueMetalChick Yeah, I don't get how anyone can have much of an opinion on her.

@CaptainCanadia The only thing I really know about her is that she's done many trashy photo sessions.

@BlueMetalChick which I think is amazing ! Finally someone without an agenda other than to support her husband and raise their son.

@TexChik Isn't that usually frowned upon for a First Lady?

@BlueMetalChick no I don't think so ... she has no political agenda and isn't a narcissist. That is unusual

@TexChik I've always seen the most praised First Ladies having been outspoken ones, like Jackie Kennedy and Eleanor Roosevelt. People like Nancy Reagan too but I think she was a scumbag.

@BlueMetalChick Nancy wasn't a scumbag , she was a little eccentric. And she certain wasn't the " hate Whitey "hag like moochelle was

@TexChik Who's moochelle?

Nancy Reagan is widely known for harping to promote the War on Drugs. Hell yes she was a scumbag.

@BlueMetalChick trashy ? Like playboy style ? But didn't JFK cheat on Jackie as President ? Didn't Bill Clinton Rape and abuse as President. What Melania did was done before she ever married or had children .

@TexChik Yeah, and doesn't that make them trashy too? JFK couldn't keep his dick in his pants and Bill Clinton has the nasty habit of being a predator.

@BlueMetalChick because you are a drug abuser? Drug abuse was killing kids , it was a national tragedy . She was way into astrology and started affecting her husband's decisions with it .

Moochelle ... Michelle obama .., the mooch 😂

@TexChik And look what it's done. Drug use is exponentially worse than it was before. The War on Drugs is a colossal failure.

I thought Anthony Scaramuchi was the Mooch.

@BlueMetalChick she didn't create the drug problem , she tried to fight it . Isn't it lib states that are legalizing federally illegal drugs?

@TexChik Marijuana, yes, but other than that, not really.

Reagan himself was a fundamentalist liberal, that's for certain.

@BlueMetalChick not so much .
He stood for everything liberals oppose

@TexChik I ask you this every time you start talking about liberalism, do you know what that word means? The core value of fundamental liberalism is laissez faire economics, which in simple terms means free market with as few regulations as possible. What was Ronald Reagan known for but deregulating the American economy. Sounds pretty goddamn liberal to me. Same with ideas like the NAP, the non-aggression principle. That's inseparable from liberalism. You really should learn what these words mean before you go around making shit up and looking like an asshat who never graduated high school.

@BlueMetalChick you always ask me that while trying to blow smoke up my butt about them . Libs want big government with a lot of regulations ... which is why millions of jobs left the country . Obama was oppressive . Trump , by merely nullifying the obama regs has boosted the economy , increased jobs and the GDP

@TexChik [quote]Libs want big government with a lot of regulations[/quote]
Go read some works by the original liberals. Look at guys like Adam Smith, John Locke, or Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Pretty much everything they ever wrote and stood for was to have as few regulations on the economy as possible. Free market capitalism with zero hindrance on it whatsoever. Please, stop making shit up as go along.

How does big government or regulation equal jobs being outsourced to other countries?

Obama was not a liberal, you should know that.

[quote]Trump , by merely nullifying the obama regs has boosted the economy , increased jobs and the GDP[/quote]
And where's the boost in the economy, or the increase of jobs, or the increase in the GDP? Because none of those things have been reported by anyone. Are we all missing it? Looking in the wrong place? Or are you just...y'know, making it up? Like you just did about the definition of liberalism? Look if you don't know something, just admit it. There's nothing wrong with that.

@BlueMetalChick I'm only concerned with who they are now and the damage they cause . Your apology
Tour and defense of libs falls on deaf ears here...guess you hadn't noticed

@TexChik There is no "who they are now." If they don't believe in free market economy, oppose regulation, support the NAP, and align their beliefs with capitalism, then they aren't liberals. The definition of the word does not change. That is what liberalism was defined as when the word was invented, and that is what it shall remain.

I am not defending liberals. I am reminding you that Ronald Reagan was a liberal, and that you are factually incorrect by claiming he stood for "everything liberals oppose." Your admittance that you refuse to accept any new information presented to you is basically a resignation, because at the point when you readily say that you are unwilling to think critically, you stop becoming a serious person. You've admitted to be irrational.

@BlueMetalChick no I just don't care to listen to a lib defend liberalism. You are out of touch with the libs of today... and they call them selves liberals .

@TexChik I'm not a liberal though, hasn't that become clear to you? I don't believe in an unregulated economy, or the non-aggression principle, or laissez faire economics. I don't think those are beneficial ideals. But the fact remains that after repeatedly being reminded that you have absolutely no idea what liberalism is, you continue to treat it like some kind of supervillain philosophy, like it's the Code of the Sith or something (sorry, I'm a Star Wars nerd) when you seem to be relatively liberal yourself.