Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Some clarifications about the Downvote

Hi everyone, ✌️

Thank you very much for your feedback in relation to the Downvote. 👎
We totally understand that many/most of you are not happy with it.

However, based on the feedback we're reading, I'd like to clarify some points:

1) If your posts/replies frequently have many good reactions, and sometimes you get 1 or 2 downvotes, out of MANY good reactions, [b]you really shouldn't have to worry[/b]. 👍

2) If there is a user that has been downvoting you in many posts, [b]that user will eventually start seeing less contents from you[/b]. 📉

3) You don't have to worry [b]if a user tries to use multiple accounts to downvote you. Either the system knows about it already, or will know in the future[/b], and that will only go wrong on that user, [u]and never affect you[/u]. 🚩
Only a few users have attempted this so far, and we've sent notifications to those users. The targeted users [u]were not affected[/u] by the fake downvotes.

4) A comment or post will only be pushed down [b]if the amount of downvotes surpass the amount of good reactions[/b] (and only if a [u]minimum[/u] of downvotes was reached, for that to happen). You [u]don't have to worry[/u] about the visibility of your contents being impacted [u]just because of 1 or 2 downvotes, when you got several good reactions[/u] too. 📊

5) Even if a post of yours got more downvotes than good reactions, [b]it doesn't mean that your audience will be impacted on other stories/questions that you post in the future[/b]. It only affects the post that got downvoted. 📚

5) The downvote does have a slight impact on your account reputation, but [b]that impact is VERY negligible[/b]. If you [u]maintain a much higher amount of good reactions, versus the amount of downvotes[/u], [b]your account will NEVER suffer any consequences[/b]. Only accounts who have more downvotes than good reactions are the ones that will be really impacted. 😊



[b]In summary:[/b] You don't have to worry if you get a few downvotes here and there. Only if the amount of downvotes surpasses the amount of good reactions (very rare cases), you would be affected. [b]Only troublemakers will be affected by the downvote.[/b]


I want to apologize again for not being clear in my original post when it was announced.


---

Thank you for your support and we hope you continue to stay with us.

We are constantly listening to your suggestions, so please keep giving them to us, as they are very important to the future of Similar Worlds.

Very kind regards, 🧡
- The SW Team
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Peapod · 61-69, F
@Nuno [quote]As for the Downvote, if the amount of [valid/legit] downvotes surpass the amount of good reactions, then that post will be pushed down to everyone, because it's obviously not a good post/comment.[/quote]

If I may ask, what do [i]you [/i]consider a good post or comment? I am very concerned how someone could be targeted and it looks like they deserved the downvotes. I honestly don't know why you would even want to take on the added burden of deciphering all this.

If you agree that getting "more lovers than haters" is important, can you see that more people here disagree than agree with the new feature?

I promise you that my concern is genuine. I have been on sites that had anonymous downvoting and the false accusations of who was behind it were astounding. Nothing good came of it. You may be able to see one person abusing the feature, but are you confident that a group of like minded people aren't abusing it, especially on political posts? You have got to know how ugly politics get here...
@Peapod
One of the questions not being answered on my comment.
Peapod · 61-69, F
@SapphicHeart I think a lot of people are asking this. I just can see the trouble this feature is going to create and how certain people could unfairly be censored.

We all know that some people here are incredibly popular, simply by the fact they have been active for a long time and they are well liked by their many friends. Even a benign comment could get 10 loves. I have no problem with that. I'm not competing for the "loves" here. But what worries me is the person that doesn't garnish a lot of "loves" for their views in general and may just happen to have "haters" because they are a known liberal or conservative and their views are known. See how that could hurt someone that doesn't deserve it? Hatred for people of different political or religious views is very real here and other places. I can't imagine management being able to really monitor all that. Heck, the few times I ever flagged a post for truly vile content, it has taken a year sometimes to get a notice that the post was removed!!!! I am not exaggerating that at all.
@Peapod
It's all to the point!
Peapod · 61-69, F
@SapphicHeart Thank-you.
@Peapod
I thank you, and I hope admins will take your comment seriously and give you an answer on it, they jumped over this one when replying to me, telling me I focus on the negative.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
I wouldn’t thank anyone for the evil insidious tool the admins have created and must eliminate. You described the problem perfectly and if they refuse to listen to reason and remove it then they are seriously out of touch. @Peapod
Peapod · 61-69, F
@SapphicHeart I'm not really expecting anything. It's obvious that they already made up their minds to have this. We too have free choice.

Time will tell how all this pans out. I'm sure none of us really knows the reasons chatsites do what they do.
@Peapod
Nope, and as long as they won't be honest with us, we won't get to know.
This message was deleted by its author.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
That’s an easy one. Every decision is governed by what they believe will help them the most financially. Sadly so many site collapse because their choice are simply incorrect. @Peapod
This message was deleted by its author.
Peapod · 61-69, F
@jackjjackson It makes sense because why else have a site to begin with? There has to be a financial gain somewhere. Of course I don't claim to understand any of it. It's just sad and a few of us get comfortable in our little bubble here.
Peapod · 61-69, F
@SapphicHeart @CopperCicada I have no doubt there are reasons we are not privy to. I have also seen this with past sites before they became some sort of big marketing tool that no longer was even a chatsite. The one actually sold off our personal info before shutting down permanently. There was no warning of the sell off until we couldn't sign in to our accounts. Right before that, there were changes made with the rules that I remember everyone being up in arms about.

Now before I get in trouble here, I am NOT starting a rumor here. I'm just saying that what seemingly makes no sense to us may make a lot of sense to them for reasons unknown.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
For sure. The lack of common sense and self awareness of the “scalers” is now their main hurdle. @CopperCicada
This message was deleted by its author.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
That’s not a rumor. It’s an accurate historical reference. @Peapod
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Looks like the admin that commented on this thread deleted it when he found he was only digging himself in deeper. @CopperCicada @SW-User @Dusty101 @DarkHeaven @Peapod
This message was deleted by its author.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
THAT was quite the metamorphosis. I’m sure glad I’ve never has a FB account. @CopperCicada
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Just reporting the facts CC 😆 @CopperCicada