Science & Technology

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

It is ironic that most of the people who believe in Darwinian evolution are liberal, when Charles Darwins theory is an extremely racial theory;

a racial supremacist theory that was adopted by the elite up until 30-40 years ago when all the racial stuff started getting big in America.

The anglo saxon atheist people who followed him thought that they were the superior race and that they deserved to colonize the whole world because they were the superior race. They got all of that from Charles Darwin. Just read his racial views in Descent of man and you will see.

Not to mention, it is even in the very title of the book origin of species; the sub title is the preservation of the favored races in the struggle for life. No one ever quotes the whole title.

Also notice how the alt right and more intellectually minded race realist white nationalist types always base their "science" of race on evolution. Without evolution, all of their racial ideas collapse. If you believe in Darwinian evolution, you have to believe in a superiority of certain races.

The only way all races can be equal is if God designed them, which He did. And God said in His Word that he hath created all nations of one blood.

Praise the Lord Jesus Christ. The truth shall set you free.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ViciDraco · 41-45, M

The theory is not racial at all, though sometimes racists have used it. Racists have used the Bible as well at times. Saying that blacks were the descendents of Ham and thus rightfully deserved to be slaves.

Believing in evolution as an excuse for racism means that you do not understand either evolution or human "races" very well. And your diatribe here reeks of the same ignorance.

1-25 of 88

This message was deleted by its author.

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@ViciDraco The only reason it became popular is it supported British imperialism. Remember the British empire?

SW-User

@ViciDraco Here is the problem, though: a misuse of scripture is what is used to teach racism BUT a CORRECT, clear and direct reading of Charles Darwin's own words and works show it to be INHERENTLY racist. There is no way of getting around it.

You are being dishonest if you deny this.

This message was deleted by its author.

OogieBoogie · F

@ViciDraco brilliantly said.

Either theory has been used for racism, (i mean the mark of Cain was supposed to be a black smear on his skin, that racists have used to mean 'black skinned'.

I think people forget the true meaning of the word 'race' and use it to replace ethnicity .

And when we start replacing meanings , we can prove anything we want .

OogieBoogie · F

@SW-User um.... even if you forget Darwins book, and just go with what archyology has found in the historic spread, and developmental changes in mankind, you find that from the cradle of life in africa, to the most northern and southern poles, man has slowly changed his skin colour from dark , to light, and other shades in between .

This fact isnt racist, its just a fact.

Misusing good theories to support ones own nefarious ideas isnt secluded to religion .....its everywhere.

'If you look for evil , you will find it '🤷‍♀️

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@OogieBoogie Sadly there is no evidence in support of your theory. Mankind can not be shown to have come from Africa. The fact that anthropologists keep looking for human ancestry in Africa is the direct result of Darwin who held the 'negroid race' to be primitive and a step lower on the evolutionary ladder.

This message was deleted by its author.

SW-User

@OogieBoogie Good theories? Good theories that are spread and maintained through continuous lies like the Piltdown man hoax and other proven frauds like Haeckel's embryo drawings lol. Sure.

SW-User

@BlueGreenGrey So, denying a theory that holds European people as the pinnacle of human evolution is white supremacist? Hahaha. That's so asinine it is not even worth commenting on. The level of cognitive dissonance here in you is astounding. Brainwashed.

OogieBoogie · F

@hippyjoe1955 actually ....it has been shown that we have come from africa.

Just as it has been shown that a world wide deluge happened.

Archaeological proof speaks for itself.
I mean , they are making new finds all the time that actually push back evidence of cultured civilisation from previous held dates.

Its quite fascinating .

OogieBoogie · F

@SW-User just like religion, science isnt perfect , it has its weirdos and extremists too.

Man IS imperfect.

There are many branches of religious theosophy , just as there are many branches of scientific theologies, blaming all for one is not really fair is it?

OogieBoogie · F

@BlueGreenGrey EXACTLY.
melanin production is a biological defence mechanism of the body....hence why we tan .

I read up on the implications of this ....and its interesting : they are suggesting that dark skinned people in northern climes should probably not wear sunblock due to their natural built in UV protection, as modern life reduces our exposure to sunlight , which is still essential to bodily chemical production.

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@OogieBoogie We are wonderfully made aren't we? Too bad that evolution doesn't explain it.

OogieBoogie · F

@hippyjoe1955 we are wonderfully made ....from the elements of the universe.

And no, evolution doesnt explain it all , but it does have evidence to support its theories, so far.

Too bad religion doesnt .

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@OogieBoogie If you think we are here by accident...... BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Ohhhh my sides hurt.

OogieBoogie · F

@SW-User are not aware that Darwin hated slavery , his views made him a radical for his time, and pronouncing that we.."all shared a common origin" was revolutionary.

As a woman , i could hate his views on how evolution only applied to men ....but i dont .

I forgive him for his soicially inducted ignorance, but applaud him on his ideas of an 'evolving and ever changing world '

In essence ....we are yet to become the pjnnicle species - we are still evolving: socially, physically, and consciously.

OogieBoogie · F

@hippyjoe1955 did i say that ?

Getting mean and derogative, as well as inaccurate is your choice.

I dont see evolution as an exclusion of a god , i see it more as wonderful evidence.

The statistical chances of life evolving to where it has , is incredible!
And the more one looks into physics, chemistry , astronomy etc. The more we see beautiful patters of creation, ever changing and fluxing. Energy and matter interchanging.

Its truly beautiful .

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@OogieBoogie If there is a God sufficient to create all that is then He is fully capable of guiding the changes His creation goes through.

OogieBoogie · F

@hippyjoe1955 im not denying that .
I think, ( imho), that its possible beings we percieved as 'god', may have had a hand in our evolution .

One does not necessarily exclude the other .

ViciDraco · 41-45, M

@hippyjoe1955 you think a god is needed to have created everything but are just fine with nothing having been around to create your god.

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@ViciDraco We have evidence of the beginning of the universe. What caused it?

OogieBoogie · F

@hippyjoe1955 you're asking for specification of something he didnt offer up as an argument.

Its one theory agaisnt another.

And there IS evidence in the progression and development of the universe, from imformation gathered by astronomers , physicists, geologists, archaeologists and chemists.

Its like making a cake, you can work out roughly how old it is from degredation of what currently is, and was , and whats its ingredients are.

Asking for something you cant provide on your side if the argument either , is unfair .

God is supposedly , all powerful , he is in everyrhing .
And if god is a maniplator of the forces of the univese , then this doesnt exclude the big bang theory.

In the beginning there was the word, how would you expect a gods first word to sound echoing through the nothingness of the void?
I imagine it went through it like a colossal force, like a 'big bang'.

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@OogieBoogie Let me guess. You never read the book!

OogieBoogie · F

@hippyjoe1955 god no....only exerpts .
But the guy wrote about 30 books .

You cant tell me that from all his work , all he has contribited to science, the primary piece of core infromataion you got was 'hes racist'!?
Thats it?

Wow.

Good luck with that philosophy.

1-25 of 88