Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

A post about socializing with chronic fatigue...

I do meet people face to face, but can only handle that for a few hours a week due to chronic fatigue. That's not nearly enough to satisfy all my social needs, so I spend most of my awake time online to supplement in-person interaction and that's where the difference with able-bodied people becomes painfully obvious.

Most people can only squeeze in an hour or two of active browsing some days, or a minute once or twice an hour throughout the day, while I'm pretty much constantly refreshing the page for 12-14 hours every day. With tens of people to follow, there's something more or less interesting to read from one or another regularly enough. But once I become especially interested in a message or comment from a particular person, it becomes very obvious they spent a whole lot less time online than I do. Then it turns into 10+ hours a day "waiting" for them to come online for an hour if I'm lucky.

Of course I can't and don't blame them. If I had more energy, I would be offline a whole lot more too. But that doesn't make the major imbalance any less frustrating. Shallow entertainment helps pass the time and I'm very grateful for that, but I need more and nobody seems to be able to provide that in any quantity that is significant in comparison to my days. Again: no judgment whatsoever to anyone because I fully understand other people's perspective, but it is something I struggle with nevertheless.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Prison1203 · 61-69, M
Apparently you do not understand the phrase “in person” that would make it face to face not behind a screen or on a phone , that’s not “ in person”
@Prison1203 did you even read my post? Nowhere did I say or remotely imply online is synonymous to face-to-face or in-person.
@Prison1203
I spend most of my awake time online to supplement in-person interaction

What he said is pretty clear to me. He says that he has some contact with people face-to-face... but that it is not enough to meet what he needs by itself - so SW has become his way to "top up" the interaction that he needs.

His chronic fatigue affects him in such a way that he wakes up in the morning feeling just as exhausted as he was before he went to bed the night before. There is no preventative treatment or cure for this, just therapy to help you to learn how to balance your need for rest with activity time.

Ultimately, nothing really helps with balancing the condition and the chronic loneliness that he feels.
Prison1203 · 61-69, M
@NerdyPotato I never said you did, but you implied that you supplement it online, which is totally different that face to face, and to answer the question , had I not read your post. How would I have commented what I did? Kinda slow are you not?
Prison1203 · 61-69, M
@HootyTheNightOwl are you his butt buddy? Seems like you always come to his rescue when someone comments anything negatively to him and once again. Online is not the same as face to face as was implied, I completely understand what he’s saying, yet there is an absolute difference between online and face to face contact and if he spent more time working on his fatigue instead of in a chair doing nothing he might be able to get out and meet face to face. It’s fact that the more you sit around the more you get used to it and end up with no motivation or stamina which in turn comes out as fatigue , I know when I had cancer and didn’t do anything for a month I was fatigued. But once I got over the fact that I couldn’t sit around and do nothing. I got out and overcame the fatigue that was associated with the cancer and sitting on my ass doing nothing
@Prison1203 Ssh, your ableism is showing... you're embarrassing yourself.

@Prison1203 I didn't imply that I supplement face-to-face contact with online contact, I said that outright. And that clearly means they are different things, otherwise I would have said I get face-to-face offline and online, which I didn't.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
@Prison1203 I will not tolerate insults without anything else to say. If you want make an actual argument, go ahead.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
@Prison1203 try again. You get one more chance.
Prison1203 · 61-69, M
@NerdyPotato or what you’ll block me ? Please do snowflake
@Prison1203 if you just keep spouting insults without making a point, I will indeed block you. But I'd like to offer you one more chance to address the comments we made.
Prison1203 · 61-69, M
@NerdyPotato aww poor baby reported me because you can’t handle the facts and try to back track like a little baby
@Prison1203 I did not report you and I'm not backtracking. I stand by what I wrote the first time. Now, do you have any response to what I actually said or are you just looking for a fight?
Prison1203 · 61-69, M
@NerdyPotato you said that you replace face to face with online which I stated that it’s not in fact the same and the. You said that you didn’t say that , which you clearly did
@Prison1203 I said supplement, not replace. Next argument please.
Prison1203 · 61-69, M
@NerdyPotato which implies that it’s replacing face to face with online, and k don’t think it’s because of fatigue. It’s probably because of rejection, and if you didn’t replace me then why did I all the sudden have several replies removed?
@Prison1203 supplementing does not imply replacing by any definition, and I don't care what you think the reason is. I know the reason and it isn't rejection. I don't even know what you mean by replacing you and I only removed two of your replies for reasons I already explained.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment