Top | Newest First | Oldest First
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
It’s easy to do considering we are living in an electric universe and our bodies use “electrolytes” to keep our heart and nervous system running…we put out an energy that’s easy to pick up if we are in very close proximity to other people.
BlueSkyKing · M
A bunch of junk magical thinking that is used for excuses. My adage is: If it’s not science, it’s superstition.
ElRengo · 70-79, M
@BlueSkyKing
I use to frequently agree with you.
And about Science I have some...relationship with.
Even so, few scientists, actual or former researchers, would adress that view.
I use to frequently agree with you.
And about Science I have some...relationship with.
Even so, few scientists, actual or former researchers, would adress that view.
Montanaman · M
That's why you're TheKeeper.
BlueSkyKing · M
@ElRengo Anecdotal. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. What body organs emit and absorb channeled "energy"?
ElRengo · 70-79, M
@BlueSkyKing
I´m not at all validating the original poster claims.
Not in the described terms. But (as happened before even in the history of Science) there may be a problem with colloquial vocabulary.
What I´m saying is that whatever claims for absolutes ends having simmilar bias.
Includding some with the appearance of a more rational attitude.
Not a few serious scientific theorethical explanations had to wait for decades for a better "proof".
And the proof side of Science is a needed but far from enough aspect of it.
What I´m saying is not anecdotical but intrinsic to the history of Science, as you may know.
I´m not at all validating the original poster claims.
Not in the described terms. But (as happened before even in the history of Science) there may be a problem with colloquial vocabulary.
What I´m saying is that whatever claims for absolutes ends having simmilar bias.
Includding some with the appearance of a more rational attitude.
Not a few serious scientific theorethical explanations had to wait for decades for a better "proof".
And the proof side of Science is a needed but far from enough aspect of it.
What I´m saying is not anecdotical but intrinsic to the history of Science, as you may know.