Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Meat is causing people to be illiterate.

Oatly is banned from labeling their products as oat milk because it confuses people. But if it's confusing reading the word oats and milk, yet you think it's real milk, does this mean meat is causing illiteracy issues? I'm starting to strongly suspect this meat business, I thought meat made you smart or at least that's what the industry says 🫪
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
The protein in cooked animal flesh permitted our brains to triple in size in a very short period of time , evolutionarily speaking.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@AthrillatheHunt This is just an hypothesis that's been recently critized and as for the direct reason for brain growth this has been considered to be the by product of cooking and starch, fat bioavailability.

Cooking increases calorie consumption.

https://attheu.utah.edu/facultystaff/new-study-questions-importance-of-meat-eating-in-shaping-our-evolution/

The researchers found that, when accounting for variation in sampling effort over time, there is no sustained increase in the relative amount of evidence for carnivory after the appearance of H. erectus. They note that while the raw abundance of modified bones and the number of zooarchaeological sites and levels all demonstrably increased after the appearance of H. erectus, the increases were mirrored by a corresponding rise in sampling intensity, suggesting that intensive sampling—rather than changes in human behavior—could be the cause.

We find that the apparent increase in archaeological evidence for carnivory after 2 million just reflects a better sampling of the fossil record. There’s no meaningful increase in evidence for carnivory after Homo erectus shows up on the scene,” said J. Tyler Faith, curator of archaeology at the Natural History Museum of Utah and associate professor of anthropology at the University of Utah. “Meat made us human? Not so much."
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@SatanBurger cooked animal flesh was WAY more important to our development than anything else , even agriculture.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@AthrillatheHunt The new research doesn't seem to think so and it's been debated by people who even have 20 years experience in the field. Cooking opened up higher calorie consumption, if we continue to eat meat raw and no cooking was invented, we wouldn't be where we are. Cooking was the primary driver.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@AthrillatheHunt Meat was also scarce back then it was what you caught and eating raw starches didn't help and varieties of bugs. Cooking made calorie consumption increase.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@SatanBurger cooking changed the chemical composition of meat , like it does to tomatoes.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@AthrillatheHunt Yes and cooking made more calories.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@SatanBurger not only calories. It changed the nutritional content. If a dog eats cooked meat there’s basically no nutritions content . If it eats raw meat it gets full nutritional content. Homo sapiens are the opposite. Our top 3 most important developments as a species are :1. Fire (cooked animal flesh )
2. Walking upright (this allowed us to see the world as its rulers )
3 agriculture (allowed civilizations to form )
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@AthrillatheHunt Yup cooking created all that.