Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

We were distracted with the submarine........

USDA quietly approved lab grown meat to be sold to the public.


New York
CNN

Cultivated meat, also known as lab-grown meat, has been cleared for sale in the United States.

Upside Foods and Good Meat, two companies that make what they call “cultivated chicken,” said Wednesday that they have gotten approval from the US Department of Agriculture to start producing their cell-based proteins.

Good Meat, which is owned by plant-based egg substitute maker Eat Just, said that production is starting immediately. Cultivated or lab-grown meat is grown in a giant vat, much like what you’d find at a beer brewery.

Wednesday’s move follows a series of previous approvals which have paved the way for sales of cultivated meat in the US.

Last week, Good Meat and Upside said they had received approval for labels for its product from the USDA. In March, Good said it had received a so-called “no questions” letter from the Food and Drug Administration. That letter states that the administration is satisfied that the product is safe to sell in the United States. The FDA issued a similar letter Upside Foods in November.

The nascent cultivated meat sector is being overseen by both the USDA and the FDA.

Good Meat, which has been selling its products in Singapore, advertises its product as “meat without slaughter,” a more humane approach to eating meat. Supporters hope that cultured meat will help fight climate change by reducing the need for traditional animal agriculture, which emits greenhouse gases.

The company had previously announced that it was partnering with chef and restaurateur José Andrés to bring the item to a Washington, DC restaurant. It is working with his team on a launch but doesn’t have specific information on timing at this point, according to a company spokesperson. As production ramps up, Good Meat may consider partnering with other restaurants or launching in retail, he added.

The regulatory hurdle cleared Wednesday is called a “grant of inspection,” which is issued by the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service. Applications for such a grant “are approved following a rigorous process, which includes assessing a firm’s food safety system,” an FSIS spokesperson said Wednesday.

“This announcement that we’re now able to produce and sell cultivated meat in the United States is a major moment for our company, the industry and the food system,” Josh Tetrick, co-founder and CEO of Good Meat and Eat Just, said in a statement Wednesday.

Upside founder and CEO Uma Valeti on Wednesday called the approval “a giant step forward towards a more sustainable future,” adding that it will “fundamentally change how meat makes it to our table.”

Upside is planning to introduce its product at Bar Crenn, a San Francisco restaurant, but did not share a launch date yet. Selling at Bar Crenn should help Upside learn more about how chefs and diners feel about the product, a representative said. Eventually, the company plans to work with other restaurants and make its products available in supermarkets.

For now, Upside is holding a contest to allow curious customers to be among the first to try the product in the US.

— CNN’s Katie Hunt contributed to this report.

Bill Gates is behind all this Frankenfood. He's buying up all the farmland. He's coating organic produce with chemicals, etc. All the while pretending to have good intentions.
Search and read about it instead of responding with a snappy attitude.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
MartinTheFirst · 26-30, M
Something about lab grown meat just don't sit right with me. It feels like a fictional piece of dystopian horror
@MartinTheFirst So, so true! I think they want us to be the lab rats!! That's the way they're treating us.
MartinTheFirst · 26-30, M
@LadyGrace Well maybe in the end it could escalate, it certainly would in a fictional horror
@MartinTheFirst Which is what they want for US, while THEY get all the good stuff:

[media=https://youtu.be/hL9uk4hKyg4]
MartinTheFirst · 26-30, M
@SpiritualMan good thing i live in sweden!
@MartinTheFirst Soylent Green...
MartinTheFirst · 26-30, M
@UnderLockDown it is PEPOL
@LadyGrace
So, so true! I think they want us to be the lab rats!! That's the way they're treating us.
I missed the part where they are forcing us to consume lab grown meats. I thought they were going to let the free market decide. Do I have that wrong?
This message was deleted by its author.
@SpiritualMan
If they had their way
What "they" are we talking about here. The government has demanded and continues to demand clear labeling on all food products, including the vegetable based meat substitutes (like Beyond & Impossible) and the lab grown stuff. Is it wrong, in this case, to demand clear labeling and let the markets decide?

they are trying to make crop farming more difficult
I'm not sure I see how that works, but, regardless, innovations happen. The automobile put all those buggy whip manufacturers out of business; should government step in whenever innovation threatens an older less competitive company?
This message was deleted by its author.
@SpiritualMan OK, corruption exists, I agree.

But how do you get from that to the claim that allowing lab grown meat to compete in free markets is therefore corrupt. How is lab grown meat different from other innovations that naturally disrupt markets?
This message was deleted by its author.
@SpiritualMan Competing in free markets doesn't sound to me like "suppressing."

BTW, here, care of a chat AI is the argument for alternatives to meat:
Beef production requires significantly more land and water than chicken or vegetables. To produce 100 pounds of beef, about 18 acres of land and 1,800 gallons of water are needed. For 100 pounds of chicken, about 2.5 acres of land and 400 gallons of water are needed. And for 100 pounds of vegetables, about 0.25 acres of land and 250 gallons of water are needed.

The last bit about vegetables isn't what I asked for; I asked for equivalent nutrition, not equiv. weight. So lets multiply the vegetable requirements by 5 to estimate equiv nutrition. Vegetable sourced foods are better for the future of the planet. If you can make a profit from them, and they're ecologically superior, sounds like a good business plan!
This message was deleted by its author.
@SpiritualMan Sounds like you are now engaged in mindreading. Sorry, I really can't keep up with that.

Dutch government placed restrictions on farmers in the name of the environment.
There are many kinds of regulations on farms these days; both environmental and safety related. There are many things a landowner could do to pollute the air, rivers and streams, and ground water. Thus there are many good reasons to put environmental regulations on landowners.

Sorry, in the modern world we're all interdependent. You can't just burn whatever you like or dump whatever you like in the nearest body of water.
This message was deleted by its author.
This message was deleted by its author.
@SpiritualMan US beef cows spend 1/3 of their lives on feedlots according to https://littlecreekmontana.shop/blogs/ranch-blog/food-for-thought-are-cattle-born-on-feedlots
Around 97% of cattle are finished at feedlots, where they typically spend four to six months eating grain (could be corn other grains and byproducts) to get "finished" (fattened) before slaughter.

Feedlots are where they stand ankle deep in manure and eat as much as they can. They are often injected with bovine growth hormones for faster weight gain. They are also regularly treated with antibiotics because standing in manure is so unhealthy.

Feedlots are what keep the costs of US beef down, and this helps hold down the cost of world beef. I'm guessing these practices don't fit your definition of "ethically raised." Anyway, it's in the context of feedlot beef that people are proposing vegetable based beef-like substitutes and lab grown meat.

I don't care if we force society to only get meat from humanely raised and humanely slaughtered animals and it is more difficult to eat meat more often because prices are higher, but regarding crops, I want humanity to eat crops grown in the ground or greenhouses indefinitely,

I agree with you here 100% on that.

I'll add that I find vegetable based beef-like substitutes to be ethically and environmentally superior to most forms of beef. "Impossible" meats are based on soybeans + coconut oil. with small additions from other sources for flavor and texture. "Beyond" meat is based on a few peas and beans, again with small additions from other sources for texture and flavor. These other sources include bacteria modified to produce proteins similar to hemoglobin - this turns out to be a key flavor component of beef, and there are other flavor components manufactured similarly.

As long as the world has such a huge appetite for beef, I will consider vegetable based beef-like substitutes to be a good alternative in the marketplace.
This message was deleted by its author.