@
Doomflower I think it comes to the end justifying the means. In this case I think it does But the reality is that this guy didn't start out with a charitable component. That wasn't what he was about. It evolved in to that. He was about views for money with different ways to get there. It appears that these kind of charitable efforts increase views which means more money. And sponsors like attaching themselves to charitable endeavors for the perception as well as the write off. He's taking a lot of the money from this arm of what he does, which is under a non-profit designation, and then turning it back in to charitable efforts with the corresponding cost to film them. So it runs like most charities. They're money making endeavors and lot of people don't know that if you give a charity a dollar there's no minimum on what needs to go the cause. It could be a nickel with 95 cents going to salaries and marketing to try and get more money.
In this case, I think water wells is a great use of that money. But my understanding, which could be wrong, is that the upkeep of those wells isn't in place. And that's a big part of it. My point was is that altruism isn't usually as cut and dry as just doing 'good.' It's how capitalistic societies work.