This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
kayoshin · 41-45, M
On the other hand, that 10 000 dollar dress might be auctioned for 30-50 000 $ just because it has someone else's name AND it was worn by someone famous to some event, making it unique., and that auctioned money can go to charity.
kayoshin · 41-45, M
@DIABLISS My point wasn't that it goes like that for every outfit, my point was about value. And value is what your post is really about. Your post suggests that the value is wrongly assigned and that the money could go to kids, while I showed that the value of the dress is not the problem in that context since IF they chose to they can actually do more for the kids by wearing the overpriced clothes.
Welcome to my world:
https://www.today.com/popculture/knightleys-oscar-dress-auctioned-charity-1c9433769
https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2020/04/gwyneth-paltrow-donates-trendy-oscars-dress-to-charity-auction
It's a choice. A choice few make, but it's there.
So you missed my point, it wasn't that all waste of money is good, my point was it's that not all money that seems wasted at first glance is inherently a bad thing, if you see the potential and use it it CAN be more useful than if the expense was spared.
Welcome to my world:
https://www.today.com/popculture/knightleys-oscar-dress-auctioned-charity-1c9433769
https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2020/04/gwyneth-paltrow-donates-trendy-oscars-dress-to-charity-auction
It's a choice. A choice few make, but it's there.
So you missed my point, it wasn't that all waste of money is good, my point was it's that not all money that seems wasted at first glance is inherently a bad thing, if you see the potential and use it it CAN be more useful than if the expense was spared.
kayoshin · 41-45, M
@DIABLISS if they shouldn't act like that people shouldn't reward them. But they do. And by people I don't mean the big shots who organise the events but the people who watch the events.
The fact that we show more interest in famous people in fancy clothes than in inventors, doctors and so on, gives the former more value than the latter, so it is what it is.
The fact that we show more interest in famous people in fancy clothes than in inventors, doctors and so on, gives the former more value than the latter, so it is what it is.