Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Parents be aware that your kids are in LGBTQ clubs in the public schools, and schools aren't telling the parents.

If you want your kids not to participate tell the school and your kids.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
Actually though, I'd love to apologize. Got off track with someone misunderstanding evolution and the nerd in me wanted to correct them. LGBT people do NOT need proof of their existence. At the end of the day, they have a right to protect themselves against people wishing them harm. Regardless, I don't care about scientific hypothesis this or that, it has no bearing on the subject as LGBT individuals shouldn't have to "prove" anything to begin with.
SamInAZ · 41-45, M
@SatanBurger If they make claims, they need to back them up. That is not too much to ask from anybody...and they aren't above criticism.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@SamInAZ Like you made the claim that there's no gay genes but I pointed out that there's no straight genes? Like that you mean?
SamInAZ · 41-45, M
@SatanBurger we are designed to have intercourse with the opposite sex. Buttholes were not made to be used as artificial vaginas...It isn't rocket science. We are made to be 'straight'...this is self-evident in our physiological design.
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@SatanBurger no, they indeed shouldn't. It is interesting if you look at it what causes the vast spectrum of sexuality from a non-bigoted lens. If I were to guess, I'd say there's no singular gene that's responsible for sexuality, but maybe a combination or epigenetics.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@basilfawlty89 Yeah thank you, I actually gave a link to @SamInAZ that said as much too, that there's a combination that produces sexuality in someone as what scientists have said but the link went ignored. I did want to apologize though because when I look up evolution and human sexuality, it's all hypothetical. They "know" certain things but there's so much more than one driving factor.

It's interesting but irrelevant to LGBT rights. LGBT people exist as do animals in the biological world, none of that has no bearing on determination of rights. Children deserve to be protected from bigots regardless.
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@SatanBurger totally agree.
SamInAZ · 41-45, M
@SatanBurger there are no "homosexual" animals. Comparing human sexual behavior to lower animals is absolutely ridiculous. There are no similarities past the mating part. What kook leftist "scientists" claim is "homosexuality" in animals is confused instinct reacting to conflicting stimuli. We have known this for a long time...also kind of funny that you equate homosexual behavior to animal sexuality. Kind of an accidental admission there ...😆
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@SamInAZ First off, we're not "designed" by anything. Evolution isn't a person or a God, it's not sitting there and "designing" people in labs or anything. Second, there's benefits to survival other than sex. Third, what does that make people who [b]can't[/b] have children then? What does that make it when men want head or anal because that results in non procreative sex?

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20170315-the-invention-of-heterosexuality

[quote]The first rebuttal to the claim that heterosexuality was invented usually involves an appeal to reproduction: it seems obvious that different-genital intercourse has existed for as long as humans have been around – indeed, we wouldn’t have survived this long without it. But this rebuttal assumes that heterosexuality is the same thing as reproductive intercourse. It isn’t.[/quote]

[quote]For Krafft-Ebing, normal sexual desire was situated within a larger context of procreative utility, an idea that was in keeping with the dominant sexual theories of the West. In the Western world, long before sex acts were separated into the categories hetero/homo, there was a different ruling binary: procreative or non-procreative. The Bible, for instance, condemns homosexual intercourse for the same reason it condemns masturbation: because life-bearing seed is spilled in the act. While this ethic was largely taught, maintained, and enforced by the Catholic Church and later Christian offshoots, it’s important to note that the ethic comes not primarily from Jewish or Christian Scriptures, but from Stoicism.[/quote]
SamInAZ · 41-45, M
@SatanBurger doesn't matter what designed or how our physiological being ended up designed the way it is, it has a design & the design has purposes. If you are going to continue to go all over the place & get upset over semantics...this is not going to be a productive conversation & we should end it here. We were not talking about religion.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@SamInAZ I think you lost the argument when you classify scientists you disagree with as "leftist," there's just claims and your claims are clearly wrong. Let's not turn these things into a political conspiracy because it's just idiotic. Not everyone you disagree with is a leftist whose out to get you. It could be that you literally don't know some things and you should be okay with that.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@SamInAZ That "design" encompasses more than just sticking a penis into a vagina though. Again, where does that leave "heterosexual" people that can't have children if the "sole" reason as you say is to have kids. They wouldn't exist technically.
SamInAZ · 41-45, M
@SatanBurger You lost the argument before it started, kiddo.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@SamInAZ You're a winner in your own head I'm sure.
SamInAZ · 41-45, M
@SatanBurger what does that have to do with homosexuality being a benefit to human evolution? You are bringing in emotional arguments now.
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@SatanBurger if it's SamInNarnia, just get him to doxx himself again for epic lulz. Or as he prefers to call himself - Villain!
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@SamInAZ That was in another response below. I made this as a separate response to the fact that LGBT people don't have to prove anything to be safe from abusive people.
SamInAZ · 41-45, M
@SatanBurger what does "don't have to prove anything to be safe from abusive people" mean? That makes no sense.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@basilfawlty89 I had to read that conversation to see what you were talking about and you weren't kidding lmfao 🤣🤣
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@SamInAZ [quote]SamInAZ · 41-45, M
@SatanBurger what does "don't have to prove anything to be safe from abusive people" mean? That makes no sense.[/quote]

Kids have a right to a safe place to go from their abusive parents. If you're that hostile towards gay people, I can only imagine what it's like for children who have no power
SamInAZ · 41-45, M
@SatanBurger If you mean that people deserve to not be abused, I agree. Well, I am a fan of verbal abuse..it works wonders...that's why drill sergeants exist.😆 But there is a time & place for that...it isn't something to do to your family or friends. I believe that across the board, that includes "LGBT" people.
So on that we would agree.
CestManan · 46-50, F
@SamInAZ You do not have to hide your romantic interest for men. Coming out is difficult but in real life, most people are not going to care either way. At our age people don't tell us what to do so feel free live as you want.

You could hang out at the local gay leather club and go by the name, "The strapping master".
Or you could be flamboyant and pretty.

The LGBT welcomes you, come to the colorful side. 🥰
CestManan · 46-50, F
@SatanBurger Usually these phobes are just in the closet. They often come out farting glitter.
@SatanBurger I'm protected for sure against these hate filled phobes.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@NativePortlander1970 I believe in being armed, it's a good thing.
CestManan · 46-50, F
@SatanBurger First time I heard the word "armed" was when I was a kid, I thought it had something to do with large biceps.