Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
4meAndyou · F
This is interesting:

"Another critical point raised during the discussion, around the 7:25 mark, involves warnings from Adam Swart, CEO of Crowds on Demand. Swart cautions that the protest culture in America could be exploited by paid agitators or even foreign actors seeking to fuel division. He mentions that his organization turned down a $20 million offer to recruit participants for a national rally against President Donald J. Trump, highlighting the potential for financial incentives to manipulate public demonstrations. This revelation adds another layer of complexity to the funding debate surrounding the 'No Kings' movement.

Asra Nomani builds on this point, suggesting that such financial incentives could undermine the authenticity of the protests. She argues that when large sums of money are involved, it becomes difficult to discern whether participants are genuinely motivated by personal beliefs or are influenced by external forces. This perspective aligns with broader concerns about maintaining the integrity of public discourse and civic engagement."

https://aarr.org/no-kings-protests-funding-sources-revealed/

TRUE...


A close up reveals that most of these folks are what my son used to call "Whiteheads", and the ones who aren't are housewives.

Matlock and/or the soaps...🤣🤣🤣
Nimbus · M
@4meAndyou It seems nothing is real anymore as there is always an element of subterfuge in almost everything we do.
Life is more complicated than ever!
4meAndyou · F
@Nimbus Democrat doings, lately, smell.