This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
i'd be elated, and would go all the most beautiful peaceful places, all the animals and everything else would still be there. just says there wouldbe no people.
@DancingStarGoddess: You're right... and maybe zombies.
Drdirt · 26-30, F
@DancingStarGoddess: would you feel horrible about all the animals in people's homes? That honestly the only thing I can think about when asked questions like this:/
@Drdirt: You'd be entering homes for food and supplies. Just let them out as you leave. They'll stay with you, too.
@Drdirt: not a bit, there would be no people for those homes to belong to lol. maybe the animals would start growing accustomed tot he extra shelters
Drdirt · 26-30, F
@Huntsman: There's SO many tho, you can't save even a fraction by yourself. So many would starve to death. I'm being such a Debbie Downer, sorry XD
@Drdirt: You can't save them all, but there's nothing you can do. Just do what you can.
Drdirt · 26-30, F
@DancingStarGoddess: I mean all the animals who would slowly starve to death because they are trapped inside. As weeks went on the animals you'd see would get skinnier and skinnier until eventually youd only see racks of bones with the occasional one surviving on mice or the garbage.
@Drdirt: possible, but i'd probably end up having gone toward places where there are no formal"homes" by then and stick to there, using the land to grow food and sustain shelter. so in actuality. i'd never see them. wheni got ready to travel again, i'd just have to be prepared for what i'd see, and i'm ok with that. i DID want to be an embalmer at one point. my stomach is pretty strong where that is concerned.