Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Media outlets now

The problem with media outlets now is that they all have an agenda to promote and will say and do anything to promote it. People don't have to follow any media outlets but they often do and they are often not very good outlets to follow when it comes to delivering balanced information, and not getting things out of proportion or causing hysteria (e.g covid). Most of us have a herd mentality and are inclined toward groupthink and so it's incredibly easy for the media to influence and manipulate masses of people.

These days, it's primarily left-wing outlets that are using horrible and incredibly toxic narratives to implement their agenda and gain control...sadly many people end up subscribing to their messaging, and believing what they say. The media is responsible for so much damage that it's almost unbelievable. Most of what's coming from the right now is a reaction to that, although many of them are prepared to lie as well. We have two sides willing to say practically anything to defend their agenda, attack the other side, and "win".

When I think of how they were during covid in particular, it makes me want to dismantle the news media. They say they are here to inform people, and while that is true to an extent, it is increasingly the case that they are only here to scare, influence, and compel you.
SW-User
There is and there will always be a bias in media. That's nothing new. People are biased in general.
A way to gain a more objective picture is through comparing different articles and news sources.

They are ideological because it's hard to put ones biases aside. Like you for example couldn't do that either and side with the right on this divide. Also there is something called market analysis so papers just like other medias know their core audience (academics or non academics, political view, what types of news they are most interested in...) and will cater to said audience. It's not as black and white as you put it.
Genuine question...how do you differ between alarmism and real problems? Is it according to your perception of a situation?
SW-User
@SW-User Most single parent families are not the result of death or physical violence. Usually, it's because people don't put enough effort into their relationship or family life and they just choose to pursue what they want to pursue. Arguing in front of children is bad and also damaging, but why do they have to argue to begin with?

Oh no...not sexist and racist structures! *pleads for help against these sexist and racist structures*

Those two words are just simply terrifying! How dare sexism and racism be so rampant and out of control! They're simply everywhere 😭

It seems to be that your idea of a conservative is just a moderate in reality, which is a scary thought.
SW-User
@SW-User I mean I am far left so even a "moderate" is right wing to me.
Sexism and racism is not out of control but does exist and is still a problem we are facing in society.
SW-User
@SW-User omg, what a shock

Just because something exists, it doesn't make it a problem.

Minorities can work, live in harmony, and have the same freedoms that white people do so I don't think that existing racism is particularly problematic. There may be individuals who don't like you because of your background, but what do they really matter?

We are living in western countries which means that most people are going to be white. It seems like now it's racist when the majority of the population happen to be white. Well, that is like saying that African or Asian countries are racist because there's not enough white people in them.

When you have a white majority country, it stands to reason that white people will be fairly well represented.
Fairydust · F
Yes totally agree and they own social media, your not allowed to have a different opinion, get silenced. 🤫
SW-User
@BohemianBabe ur gae
@SW-User So gae
SW-User
There is an argument that the corporate owners of these outlets are simply trying to align to what they perceive as their customer base. In addition I have heard another argument which is that the way journalists are trained has changed, it’s gone from trying to be objective towards militant activism. So reality is probably a bit of both. Either way I think it is destroying the media in general.
SW-User
@SW-User Including Disney in your argument is not going to work lol. I really shouldn't indulge it, but I will because I want to point out how absurd it is.

So, when children see Disney characters kiss on screen it is presented in a manner that is a.) suitable for children, b.) it's within the context of a children's story, and c.) the kiss or whatever other minor physical affection is being displayed is all the child can grasp, and they can't even really grasp that. It is not happening in the context of education, and it's not occurring under the guise of "enlightening" or "informing" our children. It is just entertainment, and there is no attempt in that entertainment to actually explain to children what happens in adult relationships. It's merely a passive portrayal of two characters expressing a fondness for one another in a fictional story, and it HAS to be depicted in a way that is easily understood by children, and appropriate for children. For instance, it would be weird to show a six year old child a movie about two normal adults who are romantically involved. Instead, children's movies (which predominately feature animation) have to make their characters into non-humans much of the time. Even if the main characters or some characters are human, they are in animated form and often surrounded by characters who aren't human.

Physical attraction and romance are *never* the main features of the movie either.

Teaching children about same-sex relations in an educational setting is entirely different because it is done simply for the purpose of supposed "education", not entertainment. Children can't and don't get it because they can't understand adult relationships and their complexities. Perhaps most significantly, it serves no valuable purpose and only results in confusion for children.

Seriously, I can't believe I have to explain such basic shit to you...what has the world actually come to?!
SW-User
@SW-User Basic shit is that at school all that is mentioned is that two men can love each other that's it.
There is no teaching of sex or anything like that 🤦‍♀️ That's just conservatives being irrational and in fear.
I'm done with this debate our worldviews can't be further apart
SW-User
@SW-User k den
Slade · 56-60, M
I've been telling people here for awhile I can easily see how another 3rd Reich could be created ,- even here.

You take full media immersion and focus the hate on one man, or group and it will sink in and create mass insanity. As it has here and throughout the 1st World

Look at the leftists both here and and on Racebook. Etc. Do you think they'd hesitate for a second to throw me and you into the ovens? And they'd call you a hater as you went up in flames. No irony.

Then the narrative will tell them they are the enlightened ones.
SW-User
@Slade agreed lol

It's disturbing to say the least.
Sit on the biggest dick you can find.
SW-User
@BohemianBabe Aw that's sweet 💕

I'd love that
@SW-User It might fix your cum brain.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
DDonde · 31-35, M
They're all businesses, righwing, leftwing. They're there to make money first and foremost. What gets the clicks; what generates the outrage. That is what will sell. Watching news on the TV is about as informative to you as McDonald's drive thru is nutritional.
empanadas · 31-35, M
I agree that media outlets are biased politically. I wish we could get unbiased news easily

 
Post Comment