This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Iwantyourhotwife · 22-25
Darwinism has issues with the fossil record. It is well known for real readers and students of evolution. But evolution is change over time. Humans demonstrate adaptation and so many animals do.
Speaking to the current fossil record, do you deny or accept that the fossils clearly demonstrate massive differences between the fossilized skeletons and the modern day living creatures?
And that if those are truly previously living, they are not like modern living animals today? Because I'm with you if you're against this religious stance for Darwinian evolution. However, you can see clear differences, right? No matter how it got there?
Because this would be why people adopt a belief in evolution. General evolution (considering the gossils as past living creatures) clearly would conclude that massive changes over time may have occurred, thus birthing the evolutionary core belief and models to explain it, Darwin being just another white dude giving it his go
Speaking to the current fossil record, do you deny or accept that the fossils clearly demonstrate massive differences between the fossilized skeletons and the modern day living creatures?
And that if those are truly previously living, they are not like modern living animals today? Because I'm with you if you're against this religious stance for Darwinian evolution. However, you can see clear differences, right? No matter how it got there?
Because this would be why people adopt a belief in evolution. General evolution (considering the gossils as past living creatures) clearly would conclude that massive changes over time may have occurred, thus birthing the evolutionary core belief and models to explain it, Darwin being just another white dude giving it his go