One of the hallmarks of science is its ability to make predictions which can be verified. Evolution allows many such predictions...

If the creationist wants to treat creationism as science then it must also be able to make novel, testable predictions...so...what predictions have been made using creationism which have subsequently been validated?

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

GeniUs · 56-60, M

Frankenstein's monster.
Built, tested, fought for his survival, fell in love etc.

Also I did some gardening earlier so I created a tidier garden but I must point out it's still a work in progress.

Pikachu

@GeniUs

I mean that's a fun book and the good doctor is kinda stupid...but what does that have to do with the question?

GeniUs · 56-60, M

@Pikachu because it's a book and The Bible is also a book and well there it is.
But I did do some gardening earlier.

Pikachu

@GeniUs

Gardening? It's winter!
Don't talk to me about other climates.

Tariki

Yes. Indeed. Many appear not to understand science and it's methods.

[i]Scientism[/i] is something else.

Pikachu

@Tariki Or at least they like to selectively apply them. Creationists seem to disdain the expert opinion when it comes to evolution but for some reason when they need to go to the dentist or get their computer repaired they're all in favour of special expertise lol

Add a comment...