Wrong Section
Why is evolution listed under ‘spirituality and religion’?
It should be listed under science
It should be listed under science
56-60, F
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
JohnOinger · 41-45, M
Isn't it often discussed in the religion section
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@JohnOinger If so, then why? It’s not a religion, and doesn’t even have anything to do with either spirituality or religion
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 But it's not about religion. It's all about accepting Darwin as your lord and saviour 🤣
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Bushranger Oh yes, of course... wasn’t he the one who invented Nature?
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 And divided the animals into many different species overnight when he made the Cretaceous explode.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Bushranger Yes, I read on a website how he and Alfred Nobel were involved in a conspiracy to make the Cretaceous explode. Apparently Nobel invented dynamite specifically for that purpose, and then Darwin arranged for it to be placed correctly, and Nikola Tesla supplied the detonation system.
The website author, Divine Knuckledragger, became aware of all this when he deciphered a prophecy concealed in the bible, and he wrote about it in a book, which (conveniently) you can order from his website for only $99.99
The website author, Divine Knuckledragger, became aware of all this when he deciphered a prophecy concealed in the bible, and he wrote about it in a book, which (conveniently) you can order from his website for only $99.99
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 Yes, fantastic book. I bought several copies because it was so good.
The Cretaceous explosion was pretty good, but nowhere near as good as their Big Bang. If it wasn't for Darwin et al, there'd be nothing at all in the whole universe.
The Cretaceous explosion was pretty good, but nowhere near as good as their Big Bang. If it wasn't for Darwin et al, there'd be nothing at all in the whole universe.