Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Accept the Theory of Evolution

When you inhale through your nostrils, the flow of air branches into four pairs of large chambers tucked in the bones of your face… the nasal sinuses, which are cavities inside our heads. The air comes into contact with mucous membranes… wet and sticky tissue that catches dust and other particles, including bacteria and viruses, so that they don’t reach your lungs.

The mucous membranes produce a slow and steady flow of sticky mucus. This mucus is swept away by tiny, pulsating, hairlike structures called cilia. The mucus drains into several spots and is ultimately swallowed and sent to the stomach (where the acid destroys it).

Sometimes the system gets gummed up, and that can lead to a sinus infection. Bacteria can establish an infection that may spread throughout the sinuses and beyond. Mucus, normally thin and mostly clear, becomes thick, viscous, and dark green when you have an infection.

Have you ever noticed that dogs, cats, and other animals don’t seem to have head colds nearly as often as humans do? Most humans suffer between two and five head colds (also called upper respiratory infections) per year, and these are often accompanied by full-blown sinus infections. For dogs it’s different. Dogs can get sinus infections, which show up as a runny nose, but it’s rare for them. Most dogs will go their whole lives with no major episodes of infection in their nasal sinuses.
 
In fact, sinus infections are possible but rare in all non-human animals, although they are a little more common in other primates. Why is it so bad for us?

The reason is that our mucous drainage system is a mess. Specifically, the most important drainage-collection pipes are installed near the [i]top[/i] of the largest pair of cavities, the maxillary sinuses, located underneath the upper cheeks. Having the drainage-collection point high within these sinuses is a problem because of gravity. While the sinuses behind the forehead and around the eyes can drain downward, the largest and lowest two cavities must drain upward.

Because the mucous collection duct is located at the top of the chamber, gravity cannot help with drainage. This is the reason why sinus infections are so common in humans but unheard of in other animals.

This is why some people with colds and sinus infections can briefly find relief by lying down and tilting their head back. However, the relief is only temporary. Once a bacterial infection takes hold, drainage alone can no longer combat it, and the bacteria must be defeated by the immune system.

What kind of plumber would put a drainpipe anywhere but at the bottom of a basin?
Why is the drainage system at the top of the maxillary sinuses instead of below?

The evolutionary history of the human face holds the answer. As primates evolved from earlier mammals, the nasal features underwent a radical change in structure and function. In many mammals, smell is the single most important sense, and the structure of the entire snout optimises the sense of smell. This is why most mammals have elongated snouts... to accommodate huge air-filled cavities full of odour receptors. As our primate ancestors evolved, however, there was less reliance on smell and more reliance on vision, touch, and cognitive abilities. Accordingly, the snout regressed, and the nasal cavities were squashed into a more compact face.

Nowhere are there more differences between humans and nonhuman primates than in the facial bones and skull. Humans have much smaller brows, smaller dental ridges, and flatter, more compact faces. In addition, our sinus cavities are smaller and disconnected from one another, and the drainage ducts are much skinnier… a side effect of making room for our big brains.

This rearrangement produced a suboptimal result that has left us more susceptible to painful sinus infections than any other animal.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
Evolution relies entirely on mythology. It began back in the bronze age. It wes discredited then. It is being discredited now for lack of evidence or logic. Little things that mere bags of chemicals can not understand. Their chemicals won't let them. Blind people explaining darkness while everyone else sees light. Too Funny. Evolutionists sound like fundamentalist religionists (which they are) Peddling their quack nostrums. Out of nothing everything came for not reason at all. As nothing became something it made all kinds of rules for no reason at all. Then again for no reason at all it formed dinosaurs that later went on to become canaries and dogs that went on to be whales. Of course the evolutionists have evidence!!! Ah yes the evidence fossil records that show extinct species but nothing the shows evolution. Well then shared genetic material, the very thing you would expect if it had a common Designer but not what you would expect if life were to arise spontaneously since after all if chemicals can form life all by themselves they must have done it many many times and the genetic codes would be different every time a new life form was generated by said raw chemicals. Logic is not an evolutionist's friend. But what should be expected from bags of chemicals? Certainly not art or music or literature or science or.... Those are things not born of chemicals.
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
@hippyjoe1955 HAVE A DAY OFF!! 🤦‍♀️
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Harriet03 After you dingbat!
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@hippyjoe1955 Amusing, but you [i]still[/i] haven’t offered an explanation for identical pseudogene genomic scarring, nor for cytochrome c restrictions, nor for chromosome 2 fusion, nor demonstrable evolution in core samples of marine organisms, nor embryology reflecting our development from earlier species.

You know, I’m beginning to think you don’t have an explanation for that evidence.

Perhaps that’s why you act as if you’ve never seen it.

Perhaps I should walk you back through that evidence... or does it still frighten you?
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 My explanation is certainly more sound than your nonsense. Do you even read what you write? What wild speculation based on bigotry not logic. Too Funny!!!!
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
@hippyjoe1955 [image deleted]
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Harriet03 So you like the nutbar bag of chemicals from NZ can't figure out that what she described is by design and not by accident? WOW. Does not speak well of your powers of observation. I thought you had an IQ of at least room temperature but I am not so sure any more. Maybe I am expecting too much from accidental bags of chemicals that have no purpose or design.
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
@hippyjoe1955 You are unbelievable!! 🤦‍♀️
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@hippyjoe1955 [quote]My explanation[/quote]

Magic?

That’s not an explanation... it’s a celebration of Bronze Age abject ignorance
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 You are the only one that believes in magic. No other explanation for the nonsense you spew. I believe in Intelligent Design because where ever I look I see design in both form and function. The only explanations you have is magic or accident. I know both of those don't work.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@hippyjoe1955 intelligent design = creationism = magic
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 Nothing magically becoming something for absolutely no reason is true magic thinking. Believing there is Something beyond inadequate natural forces that brings order order out of chaos, light apart from dark. wet from dry land from ocean life from non life makes perfect logical sense. Believing natural processes that are shown to inadequate to the job (1E=42,000 just for one example) is relying on magic to a degree I could never believe. That is why I abandoned your way of thinking about 35 years ago. Nothing has ever convinced me that your nonsense is true even though I once believed it. Too bad you can't think or you would come to the same conclusion I did. Evolution is nonsense.
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@hippyjoe1955 Again with the something out of nothing schtick 🤣.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Bushranger Indeed... his claim is that nothing made something which then used magic to make everything... and really botched the job. 😀
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 will you also be talking about the human back? That wonder of creation that often causes major issues.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Bushranger Yes, that’s definitely on the list... as well as why we have too many bones 😀
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 Now, the bones story is one I'd love to hear.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 Because we are designed and not evolved. Some people are thick and then there is a whole different category of stupid called evolutionists. Your motto is, "When none of the evidence fits the theory the evidence must be made to fit the theory". Thus the fact that you are not scientists at all. you are cult members who refuse to conduct and experiments to back up your assertions. Nor do you have any explanations on how things developed. The single cell. The single cell becoming multiple cell organism. The multiple cell's division of labour (specialization of organs and systems) in support of the whole. The development of sensory organs. The development of sexual reproduction. The life cycle of insects. etc etc etc etc. None of your explanations goes beyond your version of pig grunts and squeals. "it is all just an accident". Not a logical thought in the lot of you but you believe (not think) you are absolutely right and the science is settled. What a clown car full of bags of chemicals trying to be serious. Oh well you all to serve a purpose. You are always good for a laugh.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@hippyjoe1955 Is there something you want to say... or did you just want to be noticed?
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 Yes. You are not very bright and you really need to catch up on the latest science. The 1960s stuff you peddle is severely out of date and it makes you look rather foolish. Nice false tautology you got going though.
Bushranger · 70-79, M
🤣🤣🤣
Bushranger · 70-79, M
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-39558-8

Yes, it's terrible when there's no research into how unicellular organisms can evolve into multicellular ones. The article I linked to is obviously a fake.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Bushranger That’s a nice piece of work!

Unfortunately, I feel that if you expect him to read that, you’ll need to put the article into a simplistic pamphlet.

Perhaps a folksy homily about what your former (and totally fictitious) professor used to say..?
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 Or perhaps a short dissertation on how it disproves Darwin because its, obviously, impossible for for this to happen. Obviously, if it did, it is an example of creation.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 Except you can't get a single one started and if you believe that bunkum I have some oceanfront property in Saskatchewan. What nonsense. One has to have a single firing synapse to even think it is plausible. Here is a hint. It is not plausible or even defensible as an explanation.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 Lmao back to the cant get it started nonsense - like clockwork.