This thread highlights a mix of valid concerns, misconceptions, and geo-strategic reality checks. Let’s unpack a few critical points with clarity and precision:
🔥 Original Post (Jokersswild):
"If Trump attacks Iran, you won't have any gas/oil, unless you go beg Russia."
This kind of alarmist framing oversimplifies the complex web of global energy flows and strategic resilience planning that Europe (especially post-Ukraine) has undertaken. While Middle Eastern instability would tighten global supply chains and raise prices, Europe would not be plunged into darkness overnight.
⚖ What’s True:
Iran’s threats to retaliate by striking Saudi, UAE, or Qatari infrastructure if attacked by the U.S. are credible—these states are rivals, and critical energy chokepoints (especially the Strait of Hormuz) are at risk.
Europe’s LNG imports from Qatar and oil from Gulf producers would take a hit. Your 15–17% disruption estimate is roughly reasonable in a high-conflict scenario.
European gas storage levels are not infinite. After a prolonged embargo or regional conflict, those reserves would shrink—causing price spikes, rationing, or industrial slowdowns.
❌ What’s Not Quite Right:
Europe wouldn’t have to “beg Russia.”
Russia is already effectively out of the European market due to sanctions and sabotage (e.g. Nord Stream). No major European government is pivoting back to Moscow.
Iran doesn’t export to the West much.
Due to sanctions, Iran sells oil to China and a few others through gray markets. If war broke out, Iran’s own exports would halt. The shock comes not from Europe losing Iranian oil, but from collateral damage to Gulf infrastructure.
The U.S. is not fully insulated.
As @ElwoodBlues correctly points out, U.S. refineries are designed for heavy crude. Disruption to Gulf flows would create bottlenecks, especially for diesel, jet fuel, and shipping fuel—impacting trucking, farming, and industry.
✅ Smart Contributions:
@ninalanyon is correct: Europe has diversified suppliers — USA, Norway, Algeria, Qatar, etc. LNG terminals have been fast-tracked and storage policies toughened post-Ukraine.
@Jenny1234 adds useful context. Europe’s supply sources have already shifted significantly.
@ElwoodBlues is dead-on about the difference between light tight oil (LTO) and heavy sour crude. This isn’t just technical nitpicking—it affects how quickly the U.S. can pivot in a crisis.
🧠 The Bigger Picture:
If Trump bombs Iran:
Oil prices could spike globally, possibly above $150/barrel temporarily.
LNG markets tighten, especially if Qatar is targeted.
Europe faces short-term pain, but its shift away from Russian dependence means it’s not helpless.
U.S. refineries could experience mismatches in crude inputs vs demand for diesel/heavy products.
China, India, and the Global South may benefit from discounted crude as war premiums push sanctioned oil into side markets.
💡 Strategic Takeaway:
Instead of blaming “Europeans” or “Americans” as monolithic actors, this situation illustrates the interdependent vulnerabilities of a globalized energy system. Everyone would be affected—but not equally, and not fatally.
🔥 Original Post (Jokersswild):
"If Trump attacks Iran, you won't have any gas/oil, unless you go beg Russia."
This kind of alarmist framing oversimplifies the complex web of global energy flows and strategic resilience planning that Europe (especially post-Ukraine) has undertaken. While Middle Eastern instability would tighten global supply chains and raise prices, Europe would not be plunged into darkness overnight.
⚖ What’s True:
Iran’s threats to retaliate by striking Saudi, UAE, or Qatari infrastructure if attacked by the U.S. are credible—these states are rivals, and critical energy chokepoints (especially the Strait of Hormuz) are at risk.
Europe’s LNG imports from Qatar and oil from Gulf producers would take a hit. Your 15–17% disruption estimate is roughly reasonable in a high-conflict scenario.
European gas storage levels are not infinite. After a prolonged embargo or regional conflict, those reserves would shrink—causing price spikes, rationing, or industrial slowdowns.
❌ What’s Not Quite Right:
Europe wouldn’t have to “beg Russia.”
Russia is already effectively out of the European market due to sanctions and sabotage (e.g. Nord Stream). No major European government is pivoting back to Moscow.
Iran doesn’t export to the West much.
Due to sanctions, Iran sells oil to China and a few others through gray markets. If war broke out, Iran’s own exports would halt. The shock comes not from Europe losing Iranian oil, but from collateral damage to Gulf infrastructure.
The U.S. is not fully insulated.
As @ElwoodBlues correctly points out, U.S. refineries are designed for heavy crude. Disruption to Gulf flows would create bottlenecks, especially for diesel, jet fuel, and shipping fuel—impacting trucking, farming, and industry.
✅ Smart Contributions:
@ninalanyon is correct: Europe has diversified suppliers — USA, Norway, Algeria, Qatar, etc. LNG terminals have been fast-tracked and storage policies toughened post-Ukraine.
@Jenny1234 adds useful context. Europe’s supply sources have already shifted significantly.
@ElwoodBlues is dead-on about the difference between light tight oil (LTO) and heavy sour crude. This isn’t just technical nitpicking—it affects how quickly the U.S. can pivot in a crisis.
🧠 The Bigger Picture:
If Trump bombs Iran:
Oil prices could spike globally, possibly above $150/barrel temporarily.
LNG markets tighten, especially if Qatar is targeted.
Europe faces short-term pain, but its shift away from Russian dependence means it’s not helpless.
U.S. refineries could experience mismatches in crude inputs vs demand for diesel/heavy products.
China, India, and the Global South may benefit from discounted crude as war premiums push sanctioned oil into side markets.
💡 Strategic Takeaway:
Instead of blaming “Europeans” or “Americans” as monolithic actors, this situation illustrates the interdependent vulnerabilities of a globalized energy system. Everyone would be affected—but not equally, and not fatally.
Ferise1 · 46-50, M
@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays that’s ChatGPT huh
@Ferise1 Sure thing. The world's smartest machine! 🤣
IHateViolence · 36-40, M
I'm European, and I have nothing to do with the decisions of people I haven't voted for, nor I have any control of.
So, saying it's my fault and "thought I was smart" is quite unfair.
So, saying it's my fault and "thought I was smart" is quite unfair.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Jokersswild · 22-25
@jshm2 Trump just dropped the bomb so let's see the assessment. I doubt it did much damage 😕
JonUK41 · 36-40, M
Well there's no such thing as Europe as a joint decision making enterprise. There's the EU but it would take them 3 years to make a decision to go the bathroom.
I'm in the UK so we can/will make our decisions. Iran is not a major supplier of oil to the UK.
I'm in the UK so we can/will make our decisions. Iran is not a major supplier of oil to the UK.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
@Jokersswild The US is self sufficient in energy it only imports because there are times when other producers are cheaper. And yes Europe would suffer shortages of energy of the Middle East ceased supplying. But a reduction in supplies of energy will probably be the least of our worries if we end up with a general war in the region.
ElwoodBlues · M
@ninalanyon In terms of pure barrels of oil, the US is self sufficient. However, the oil we get from shale & fracking is "lighter" and produces less diesel & heating oil. Most US refineries are configured to process heavy crude oil, so they still buy heavy crude from the middle east.
We've been fracking since Obama, so I can't understand why US oil companies haven't reconfigured more refineries to process light crude. Long story short, a disruption in the Strait of Hormuz could do real damage to US trucking this summer.
We've been fracking since Obama, so I can't understand why US oil companies haven't reconfigured more refineries to process light crude. Long story short, a disruption in the Strait of Hormuz could do real damage to US trucking this summer.
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
@ElwoodBlues Then the US would have an incentive to make it's use of energy more efficient. The lack of Russian gas has already had an effect in that direction in Europe. Of course in the short term it will hurt.
We should all be buying those cheap Chinese solar panels that are available now and covering every roof with them.
We should all be buying those cheap Chinese solar panels that are available now and covering every roof with them.
Jenny1234 · 56-60, F
Not to worry since they’ve already set a plan in place to stop being dependent on Russia. Europe’s key suppliers are Norway, USA, Algeria, Qatar, UK, and there are some other countries that contribute to the EU gas imports
iamthe99 · M
That's why we're moving to renewables here in Europe. So we're not subject to the whims of man-children who want to play at war.