Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The Summer of 2023 was the hottest in “2,000 years”

The stark finding, comes from one of two new studies released on Tuesday, as both global temperatures and climate-warming emissions continue to climb. Scientists had declared last year's June to August period as the warmest since record-keeping began in the 1940s.


New work published in the journal Nature suggests the 2023 heat eclipsed temperatures over a far longer timeline - a finding established by looking at meteorological records dating to the mid-1800s and temperature data based on the analysis of tree rings across nine northern sites.


"When you look at the long sweep of history, you can see just how dramatic recent global warming is," said study co-author Jan Esper, a climate scientist at Johannes Gutenberg University in Germany.

Last year's summer season temperatures on lands between 30 and 90 degrees north latitude reached 2.07 degrees Celsius (3.73 degrees Fahrenheit) higher than pre-industrial averages, the study said.

Based on tree ring data, the summer months in 2023 were on average 2.2 C (4 F) warmer than the estimated average temperature across the years 1 to 1890. The finding was not entirely a surprise. By January, scientists with the European Union's Copernicus Climate Change Service were saying the year of 2023 was "very likely" to have been the warmest in some 100,000 years.


However, proving such a long record is unlikely, Esper said. He and two other European scientists argued in a paper, last year that year-by-year comparisons could not be established over such a vast time scale with current scientific methods, including gleaning temperature data from sources such as marine sediments or peat bogs.


"We don't have such data," Esper said. "That was an overstatement."


Last year's intense summer heat was amplified by the El Nino climate pattern, which typically coincides with warmer global temperatures, leading to "longer and more severe heatwaves, and extended periods of drought," Esper said.
Heatwaves are already taking a toll on people's health, with more than 150,000 deaths in 43 countries linked to heatwaves for each year between 1990 and 2019, according to the details of a second study, published on Tuesday in the journal PLOS.


That would account for about 1% of global deaths - roughly the same toll taken by the global COVID-19 pandemic. More than half of those heatwave-related excess deaths occurred in populous Asia. When the data are adjusted for population size, Europe had the highest per capita toll with an average of 655 heat-related deaths each year per 10 million residents. Within the region, Greece, Malta, and Italy registered the highest excess deaths.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Patriot96 · 56-60, C
Ah those trigger words SCIENTIFIC STUDY, SCIENTISTS SAY. Then the sheeple believe anything.
Did the use tree rings, or groundhog farts
QueenOfZaun · 26-30, F
@Patriot96 I believe in observable evidence.
Patriot96 · 56-60, C
@QueenOfZaun ah but temps 2000 years ago are observable.
Even temps back to or before can not be proven as accurate
QueenOfZaun · 26-30, F
@Patriot96 We can accurately observe temperature going back several thousand years using archaeological evidence as to what the ground and atmosphere was like back then.

Also, we can just see changes within the environment in just the last 100 years. We have seen ice sheets decline, the sea level rise, corals reefs dying because of warmer ocean temperatures and recorded temperatures in general are warmer and have been rising.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
QueenOfZaun · 26-30, F
@sladejr Except that the “trend” here is that the Earth gets continuously hotter at an unprecedented rate never before seen in the geological record of out planet. Unlike previous shifts in climate, the drastic increase in global temperature isn’t allowing the environment or the species that live there enough time to adapt. Previous geological changes in weather happened slowly over the course of millennia.

That is not the case here because of carbon being emitted into the air which is trapping sunlight into the atmosphere. Excess carbon has accelerated the heating of the Earth; caused by manmade air pollution since the dawn of the industrial revolution.

This is all well documented, well researched and is the scientific consensus. We have seen the oceans get warmer, we have seen ice sheets disappear permanently over the course of a century, we’ve seen the abnormalities in heat destroy ecological environments that would have survived otherwise.

The greenhouse effect is a naturally occurring phenomenon that keeps sunlight within the Earth’s atmosphere. However our meddling has caused a rapid increase in this natural process.

Observe this diagram taken from temperature records to several decades ago.



For more data analysis, below are hypothetical pathways of carbon emissions ("representative concentration pathways," or RCPs) throughout the twenty-first century based on different possible energy policies and economic growth patterns.

On the right graph we see projected temperature increase relative to the 1901-1960 average depending on which RCP we eventually follow.




Finally here is a comprehensive graph combining everything we know about our Earth’s climate based on geological evidence like the fossil record, air samples of the atmosphere taken from preserved samples, radiology, sediment analysis and modern day temperature measurements.



All of this information is freely available for you to look at. Adapting environmentally friendly products will not tank the economy. As we become more technologically advanced, the technology to reduce our emissions becomes cheaper to make as well. Our carbon emissions will be reduced eventually. Which will slow climate change down but not stop or reverse it. The switch to electric cars will be happening over the next several decades slow as it maybe.

Also, I’m not sure what the proverbial communist figure Vladimir Lenin has to do with anything. I’m interpreting that as some sort of insult towards me because you erroneously presume I am a communist.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
QueenOfZaun · 26-30, F
@sladejr How so?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
QueenOfZaun · 26-30, F
@sladejr Of course we need carbon dioxide to survive. Nobody is saying that we don’t.

Pollution is the introduction of harmful materials into the environment.
The problem is that we have an overabundance of carbon dioxide emissions which is accelerating the greenhouse effect.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
QueenOfZaun · 26-30, F
@sladejr You think I want to eliminate all mammals? That’s pretty insane.


How about we phase out fossil fuels because they’re damaging to the environment, are becoming more costly economically and their use is becoming increasingly impractical given the current advances in technology and logically they are a non renewable resource whose continued use becomes more banal as time goes on.