Nature & Animals > Environment

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What do Global Warming, Covid and Covid Vaxes have in common?

Bad science in the service of bad policy in the service of the elimination (depopulation) of humanity and limiting humanities' freedoms. They are both premised on the idea that we live in a fragile world in which the slightest change will result in catastrophic ends. Mankind's 0.035% of atmospheric CO2 will result in the world coming to an end. (despite the fact that there are multiple negative feedback loops that such an event could not happen) or the idea that a new virus will destroy all of mankind even though humans and viruses have been doing battle since Adam ate the forbidden fruit. Hmmmm Yeah bad science remains bad science but what it really funny is the unscientific among us who think that they understand science and try to perpetuate the silly stories they read in the popular press. Like the 1995 NYT story that said in 25 years all the beaches on the east coast of America would be under water. They even went on to say that already in 1995 the beaches were disappearing at a rate of 2-3 feet per year. Strange how there are satellite images of the beaches for the last 27 years and there would appear to be no beach loss at all. Hmmmm You don't suppose junk science in the popular press is still junk science do you?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Dan193 · 31-35, M

Why would they want to depopulate the world, especially with the population growth in the west stagnating

1-25 of 137

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@Dan193 I completely agree with you. The human population is in decline already despite what the UN says. There is a belief among many powerful people that humanity is a weed that needs to be either eliminated or severely limited.

Dan193 · 31-35, M

@hippyjoe1955 sorry for my skepticism, but how would we know what believes hold the really powerful people of this world

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@Dan193 They have said so. It is common knowledge if you have been reading their publications.

Dan193 · 31-35, M

@hippyjoe1955 ok

ElwoodBlues · M

@hippyjoe1955 [quote] It is common knowledge if you have been reading their publications.[/quote] Interesting, I'd like to read more. Can you provide a link to any of these publications?

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@ElwoodBlues I can but you don't follow links. Might I suggest you start reading the books published by the likes of Klaus Schwab? Have a nice clueless life and enjoy your silly fear porn.

ElwoodBlues · M

@hippyjoe1955 You don't provide links because they show that you are a liar.
[image deleted]
I looked up a list of all 30 wind farms and NONE of them is owned by Big Oil. You lie at the drop of a hat and then fear getting caught. [b]SAD!!![/b]

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@ElwoodBlues I don't provide links because I know you won't follow them. You will try to 'fact check' them and then write more nonsense. Go read some books. Lots of them available. Klaus Schwab is quite open as to what his objectives are as is Bill Gates etc. You are just showing your ignorance again. It isn't pretty.

ElwoodBlues · M

@hippyjoe1955 DUUUDE!!! [quote] You will try to 'fact check' them[/quote] I can't fact check them unless I follow them, now can I? That means your original claim - that I don't follow links - is CONSCIOUS LIE. Just like this lie:
[image deleted]
I looked up a list of all 30 wind farms and NONE of them is owned by Big Oil. You lie at the drop of a hat and then fear getting caught. [b]SAD!!![/b]

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@ElwoodBlues DUDE science has nothing to do with reading links. Go do some reading for once in your life instead of playing the idiot on SW.

BohemianBoo · M

@hippyjoe1955 [quote]I don't provide links because I know you won't follow them. You will try to 'fact check' them[/quote]

Damn Leftists. Always wanting to know if claims are true!

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@BohemianBoo And relying on lying fact checkers to prove they are correct. Move on son. You lost the debate when you decided to post on this thread.

BohemianBoo · M

@hippyjoe1955 I agree. Fact-checking is stupid. I should just believe whatever I read in a meme, like the Right does.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@BohemianBoo the fact is that the fact checkers are not experts. They are paid clowns that have no idea what they are talking about. I read of a medical doctor who got fact checked when the doctor quoted the CDC. Yeah take your fact checkers and stick them where the sun doesn't shine. You are ignorant about science and the scientific method.

BohemianBoo · M

@hippyjoe1955 That's why fact-checking doesn't just mean looking at one source. You look at a few sources that have a history of being correct and provide their own sources for how they know what they're claiming. That's why Conservatards hate Snopes. They provide sources for all their claims.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@BohemianBoo Fact checking has nothing to do with evidence. It is a scam that certain media came up with to defend their own lack of science. Do try to keep up.

BohemianBoo · M

@hippyjoe1955 I know, right? People should just believe whatever the TV says.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@BohemianBoo So about the facebook fact checker who called one of the preeminent economists in the world wrong when the economist said the US was in a recession. Who do you believe?

BohemianBoo · M

@hippyjoe1955 Did Facebook include its own source? What was it? Were their other economists who also disagreed with the first economist?
You seem to think fact-checking is just listening to anyone who calls themselves a "fact-checker."

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@BohemianBoo Nice dodge. So who do you believe? An expert in the field and your own eyes or some clown that is paid by facebook to maintain the 'official narrative'? Too Funny. You are a joke.

BohemianBoo · M

@hippyjoe1955 You completely ignored my point. If Facebook doesn't provide its own source in which they consulted other economists, then they're not a reliable source.
This is why you shouldn't get all your news from Facebook memes.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@BohemianBoo Facebook is not a source. If it were it would be liable for what is posted on it. It has no liability because it is a town hall where people get to express their opinion. Now if you think I want to listen to some uneducated snot nose dump on a renowned expert over something everyone can see that the expert is right and the fact checker wrong..... Seriously you need to come to terms with the fact that the government is not your friend. They are working tirelessly trying to create food shortages. What will it take for you to wake up to that FACT?

BohemianBoo · M

@hippyjoe1955 No shit, that's why I said you'd have to see which sources Facebook is citing when they fact-check something.
I swear, it's like you're missing half your brain.

Dan193 · 31-35, M

SpOnGeBOb

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@BohemianBoo Why would anyone want to fact check the fact checker instead of just ignoring them knowing that they are paid gatekeepers? Seriously the last person I would look to for information or confirmation is a facebook/twitter/social media fact checker. If I want information from something I read on social media I will do my own searching to confirm or deny.

1-25 of 137