Anxious
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

How can America's SCOTUS claim to be pro-life by overturning Roe vs Wade, when it's clearly not pro-life on Earth?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
Well, they haven't claimed to be pro-life

They made a ruling regarding the constitutionally of Roe vs Wade and decided defining a theory of life was not their job

It would have been interesting if they'd taken Roberts position

To not fully overturn Roe vs Wade but uphold the Tennessee 15 week limit

Or if they had tried to answer the epistemological and existential questions of life

I think we would've liked their ruling even less because that could've led to overturning liberal abortion laws across the country
SW-User
@SW-User True, although in this case I'm talking about their ruling to limit America's EPA's power to reduce emissions
SW-User
@SW-User yeah I haven't studied that but it doesn't sound great

🌏