This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
Well, they haven't claimed to be pro-life
They made a ruling regarding the constitutionally of Roe vs Wade and decided defining a theory of life was not their job
It would have been interesting if they'd taken Roberts position
To not fully overturn Roe vs Wade but uphold the Tennessee 15 week limit
Or if they had tried to answer the epistemological and existential questions of life
I think we would've liked their ruling even less because that could've led to overturning liberal abortion laws across the country
They made a ruling regarding the constitutionally of Roe vs Wade and decided defining a theory of life was not their job
It would have been interesting if they'd taken Roberts position
To not fully overturn Roe vs Wade but uphold the Tennessee 15 week limit
Or if they had tried to answer the epistemological and existential questions of life
I think we would've liked their ruling even less because that could've led to overturning liberal abortion laws across the country
SW-User
@SW-User True, although in this case I'm talking about their ruling to limit America's EPA's power to reduce emissions
SW-User
@SW-User yeah I haven't studied that but it doesn't sound great
🌏
🌏