Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Should education be free?

We know that education isn’t only for teachers and students. It’s an institution, a group of people who interact with each other every day to achieve the same goal: coach our new generation. Definitely, the quantity and quality of education that the students receive depends on a big part of the countries’ government. I can explain what is happening in Argentina.
When I was a kid (a lot of years ago 😊) almost all educational institutions were public, and only a small percentage was private. Children who had the possibility to go to private school sometimes were part of the “upper-society”. The educational level that students received in private institutions was no different than public school education. Nevertheless, the education distance between private and public schools have increased year after year. Nowadays, the government doesn't invest in education as they should. Is it useful to have free education with a substandard level or a standard to an exceptional level of education paying tuition every month? Obviously, everyone wants the best education for their children, however, the immediate question is whether common people can pay tuition or not. The answer is no. The private school tuition is really expensive, so only a small group of people can afford it. What is your opinion about this? Tell me about your experience in your country, city, state, or province. Bye!
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Gloomy · F
Yes and I am against private schools because they create and uphold a classist system.
pdockal · 56-60, M
@Gloomy

i went to catholic school
my parents struggled to pay for it
so what are you blabbering about ?
Gloomy · F
@pdockal
my parents struggled to pay for it

Exactly my point that's a problem

and don't see why religious schools should even exist.
pdockal · 56-60, M
@Gloomy

the education is better in those schools & less disruptive children because they just kick them out so that the rest of the kids can learn with out disruptions
the teachers dont get paid as much as public but the system is better then FREE PUBLIC education
Gloomy · F
@pdockal
the education is better in those schools

Yes damn it that's the problem. Parents wealth creates inequal access to education and you can't even tell me that funded high quality education would be impossible when other first world countries manage to provide it.
pdockal · 56-60, M
@Gloomy show me another country with them same amount of children to educate with the states ahving the biggest say (the states have more say then the federal governemnt) doing better then USA
Gloomy · F
@pdockal In general most first world nations are doing better than the US also when it comes to the equal access to education.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Gloomy they can supplement regular education, but should not replace public education.
pdockal · 56-60, M
@Gloomy

which ones have the same issues that we do .... size & individual states who educate differently ... i dont think any other country is as unique as we are .... our states have rights that most places in most countries do not
Gloomy · F
@pdockal Then just split up and no longer be the united states. Why even have a federal government.
pdockal · 56-60, M
@Gloomy

you have no idea how this country was founded & works
you probably think were a democracy
the civil war was a struggle between the rights of the states & the federal governmet
im NOT going to give you a lesson in history
im not going to reply because .................................................................
Gloomy · F
@pdockal You are a Republic and (supposed to be) a democracy
pdockal · 56-60, M
@Gloomy

Where are you from