This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
FreeSpirit1 · 51-55, F
They changed it to "climate change"after it was proven that the earth wasn't warming at the rate they said.
TexChik · F
@FreeSpirit1 yep ... 😉
snowbelt · 61-69, M
@FreeSpirit1 They changed it to "climate change" after deniers couldn't understand that it meant GLOBAL climate change and there might be some areas that would get cooler, or wetter, or drier. Climate change better describes the reality.
sogdianrock · 61-69, M
hi FreeSpirit
I heard the term Global Weirding but that is still due to Global Warming.
B est wishes
:)
I heard the term Global Weirding but that is still due to Global Warming.
B est wishes
:)
FreeSpirit1 · 51-55, F
@snowbelt The globe is warming,just not as alarmingly so as they said. They also predicted in the 1970's we would have a cooling which was supposed to be happening now.
snowbelt · 61-69, M
@FreeSpirit1 No. Those 1970s predictions were in two mainstream articles--one in Time Magazing and one in Newsweek in 1974 and 1975. There was no scientific consensus that there was going to be global cooling.
TexChik · F
@snowbelt sorry Mr. Liberal, it seems you guys always rewrite history when the egg starts sticking to your face . Their words , not mine . Now with climate change you libs are using a manipulated computer model to PREDICT the faux disasters a few percentage points of one degree of temperature increase are " going to do " in 100 years . The premise is so ignorant it's mind boggling . Yet libs say all those billions they gleam from the ignorant will STOP a naturally occurring phenomenon . But nothing has changed ... except Their appetite for more money ... which has increased .