Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Apparently the Covid-19 vaccine debate is still ongoing, so I have two questions for the sceptics:

1) Why would the billionaires of this world want to kill the majority of their customers and employees who supply them with their wealth?
2) Why would they kill those who follow their advice/orders and let the ones who don't let themselves be controlled live?

If I benefited from a system based on endless growth, I wouldn't invest billions into shrinking it. But if I did want to damage the system that keeps making me richer for whatever reason, I'd release a real deadly virus to get rid of the non-compliant and encourage a safe and effective vaccine to rescue the easily manipulated. But that's just me, maybe.

Edit: fixed typo
Top | New | Old
Makes so much sense to damage your own supply line so you get fewer raw materials so your fewer staff can make fewer products to sell to fewer customers, right???
Mindful · 56-60, F
According to a friend of mine who is an expert with numbers, A billionaire will not ever run out of money at that level they are solid. The idea that the supply of a billionaire can be damaged is likely faulty. Almost millionaires and low level millionaires are different. I'm guessing it depends on where they have their assets.
@Mindful it's true that almost nothing is impactful enough to force billionaires to rethink buying anything they want. That doesn't stop them from wanting more, more, more though. It's still extremely unlikely for them to "invest" in anything that will end up with them losing more than the investment itself.
bookerdana · M
Ever watch John Campbell on youtubr
bookerdana · M
@NerdyPotato hes on to vaccine effects after the pandemic..gotta keep an eye👀 on these people
@bookerdana is he now taking FAERS as reports of definite side effects of the vaccine? 🙄
bookerdana · M
@NerdyPotato I just check in on him now and again....he became a superstar during covid and keeps up the blather
The idea that there would be no one to supply them with workers is false. They are building AI and robotics which are more than capable of doing the tasks they wish to perform. Granted it is not perfected, but they are working to get there.

The goal in the future is not making more money. They already have the money and teh control over the infrastructure. Someone who already controlled automated systems, energy, computing power, land, and production might value other things more, like, say... Control over the future, Personal survival or radical life extension, Technological achievement, creating a supposedly superior form of intelligence, and of course, being remembered as the founder of a new civilization.

I dont think they want death for us, but are indifferent to the death of everyone else that is not directly connected to something that will grow their ability to thrive. They may pursue robots, machines, software and AI or potentially human enhancement while assuming that displaced populations will somehow adapt, even when no serious provision has been made for their dignity, livelihood, or political power.

They don't care about us. Their goal is to achieve more than anyone else. Humans are useful to them until they are not.
@nonsensiclesnail that's a very fair point. They certainly don't need to keep increasing their wealth and control is equally valuable on every scale. I guess not caring either way is a good enough answer to the first question. It still doesn't explain why they'd want the remaining population to be unruly rather than compliant though.
@NerdyPotato I think there is an assumption that harmful outcomes establish intention, which is not true. I personally don't think they are looking to kill anyone. Also, compliance does not necessarily equal value. They wouldn’t be choosing to save the rebellious and kill the obedient. The obedient would just be easier to influence and use during the process. The people who resisted and survived wouldn’t be the ones they wanted to save. They would simply be the ones who weren’t caught up in it.
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
Why would a vaccinated person be afraid of an unvaccinated person unless the vaccine doesn't work.
@MrBrownstone why don't you answer the questions in my post first? I'm happy to expand on the topic, but let's finish the one at hand before moving on.
@MrBrownstone asks
Why would a vaccinated person be afraid of an unvaccinated person unless the vaccine doesn't work.
The people that need to be afraid of the unvaccinated are the very young and those with compromised immune systems. I have a neighbor like that, wonderful cheerful woman.

The purpose of herd immunity is to protect people like her. I'm in favor protecting my community. I'm sorry to learn that you are not.

Now, with that out of the way, can you address the OP's question??
TheHammer · M
@ElwoodBlues
Exactly.

Those people are not only ignorant but also selfish and dangerous.
TheHammer · M
I admire your optimism if you think this is going to reach the ones you are trying to reach.
I lost that optimism a long time ago. My only hope now is for them to hurry up and die out
TheHammer · M
@NerdyPotato
You are better than I am.
How bout this...while you try to reach them with reason, I'll try to reach them by hitting them on the head.
These people would have no second thoughts about hitting you on the head while you try to talk to them.
But I do admit. Your approach is still needed mine is just faster.
@TheHammer I don't believe in insults. If they're not going to change their mind, so be it. Insulting them won't do any good, if it does anything at all.
TheHammer · M
@NerdyPotato I know you don't. You're a good guy. I don't mind. Violent people only understand the language of violence and we need to learn how to speak it.
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
Conspiracy theories never have that stuff sorted specifically. The point is to believe rather than have something concrete and provable.

 
Post Comment