This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Promotion for capitalism.
It's just as ugly if not worse. Because it uses gender based promotion.
Notice it doesn't say: "Stop dating men if you can't afford to take care of them". 😂
Also it doesn't give any limits on the number being dated. So it makes a assumption of endless number of women when it's near 50/50%.
What could a woman do if there wasn't at least 33% wealthy men? 🙃
BTW a guestimate of the wealthy men in the USA is 1.01% of the total population.
The well off including the wealthy is 3.94%
And the poor is 6.0%
The options are very limited for women given women out number men slightly.
It's just as ugly if not worse. Because it uses gender based promotion.
Notice it doesn't say: "Stop dating men if you can't afford to take care of them". 😂
Also it doesn't give any limits on the number being dated. So it makes a assumption of endless number of women when it's near 50/50%.
What could a woman do if there wasn't at least 33% wealthy men? 🙃
BTW a guestimate of the wealthy men in the USA is 1.01% of the total population.
The well off including the wealthy is 3.94%
And the poor is 6.0%
The options are very limited for women given women out number men slightly.