Richard65 · M
For Churchill, WW2 wasn't just a fight to defeat Fascism, it was to protect what was left of the British Empire (he said as much when he wrote the Empire would not fall under his watch). So, brave Canadians did die for Britain, but it was a specific aspect of colonial Britain they unwittingly died for. The Empire did fade eventually, with countries being granted independence. But in the subjective view of Britain's wartime leaders, the Allied armies died to protect the remnants of the British Empire.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@Richard65 It is important to realise that Winston Churchill (not yet knighted) was by no means alone in thinking the sun would never set on the Empire. Churchill's political career was over but the Empire was still held in high esteem in Britain in the 1950s, though fading fast.
It is also important to realise the primary cause of World War Two was Nazi and Japanese military expanionism and as we were to learn, their abominable cruelty. The British Empire was important but really something of a side-effect except perhaps in Churchill's mind. I wonder if secretly he did know the Empire was approaching its end but did not like to admit. For most Britons including the Government, fighting the Germans and Japanese was paramount; though Britaan certainly did have important Imperial territories in SE Asia.
In the early-1960s my Primary School had a voluntary weekly collection for a medical charity called BELRA, the British Empire Leprosy Relief Association. I think most of its work was in Africa, where the disease was and still is common and sadly, still highly stigmatic through fear.
The charity is still active, still doing very important work in co-operation with other organisations, but changed its name to Leprosy Relief Association in 1964.
Elsewhere the "BE" part lives on in the British Empire Medal honorary award, but for continuity.
It is also important to realise the primary cause of World War Two was Nazi and Japanese military expanionism and as we were to learn, their abominable cruelty. The British Empire was important but really something of a side-effect except perhaps in Churchill's mind. I wonder if secretly he did know the Empire was approaching its end but did not like to admit. For most Britons including the Government, fighting the Germans and Japanese was paramount; though Britaan certainly did have important Imperial territories in SE Asia.
In the early-1960s my Primary School had a voluntary weekly collection for a medical charity called BELRA, the British Empire Leprosy Relief Association. I think most of its work was in Africa, where the disease was and still is common and sadly, still highly stigmatic through fear.
The charity is still active, still doing very important work in co-operation with other organisations, but changed its name to Leprosy Relief Association in 1964.
Elsewhere the "BE" part lives on in the British Empire Medal honorary award, but for continuity.
Richard65 · M
@ArishMell that's why I emphasised that it was in the subjective view of Britain's wartime leadership. That is significant as they were the ones making crucial decisions. For instance, Churchill chose to reinforce the Mediterranean theatre, rather than focusing solely on defending the British Isles, recognizing the threat to British imperial power and influence in that region. So, my point was in regard to such instances. Protection of the Empire did influence British thinking in regards to an overarching wartime vision.
tenente · 100+, M
American here.
Quietly signalling support through symbolic gestures is peak Queen Elizabeth II. Not bombastic statements and clickable headlines. Monarchy isnt popular, but with my country charging towards imperialism and threatening allies, King Charles III acted the big domino reaching out to PM Carney with congratulations and all the NATO countries following his example was a very powerful demonstration of global unity with Canada.
The King wears some medals
Quietly signalling support through symbolic gestures is peak Queen Elizabeth II. Not bombastic statements and clickable headlines. Monarchy isnt popular, but with my country charging towards imperialism and threatening allies, King Charles III acted the big domino reaching out to PM Carney with congratulations and all the NATO countries following his example was a very powerful demonstration of global unity with Canada.
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
@tenente The Queen wore a snowflake broach give to her by Canada when she met Trump. The snowflake was a taunt to the extreme right referring to the "snowflake" insult and also represented Canada.
I know the monarchy cannot be overtly political but the situation with Trump's second term is very different than the first; he is litterally threatening our soveirnty .
I know the monarchy cannot be overtly political but the situation with Trump's second term is very different than the first; he is litterally threatening our soveirnty .
ArishMell · 70-79, M
None for England alone, nor for the United Kingdom, but many for things greater than single countries alone.
And with Britons, Americans and other nationalities alongside them.
And with Britons, Americans and other nationalities alongside them.
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
@ArishMell We did do it for Britain and the Empire. Canadians considered themselves loyal to the Crown and were proud to fight for England. We were also in Afganistan with Britain. Canada has always defended England, it would have been nice for a more firm stance with us against Trump. I don't think that some words of solidarity is too much to ask when we always fight and die when Britains asks.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@JimboSaturn I think the solidarity is there but kept at low key to avoid the risk of international slanging-matches that would help no-one. It's better for politicians to keep quiet and let the half-dozen or so running the Washington Circus show themselves up publicly as at least remarkably naive.
45,000. and canada is in the commonwealth and so would be protected by uk and its other commonwealth allies if the usa invaded canada