This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
The only racist in this conversation is you.
Why don't you take a few minutes and Google Original Constructionist.
Then contemplate the fact that if a woman can't be defined, then sexism can't be defined either. And legal protections for women, such as Title IX are obviated.
Now Google Title IX and obviated.
Then consider that Clarence Thomas is a Supreme Court Justice. He's Black too, you know. He just happens to be a Conservative justice.
So when you consider that fact, your racism claim is moot.
The issue here is that Jackson is not an Original Constructionist, and is an activist judge. She stated both actually.
Why don't you take a few minutes and Google Original Constructionist.
Then contemplate the fact that if a woman can't be defined, then sexism can't be defined either. And legal protections for women, such as Title IX are obviated.
Now Google Title IX and obviated.
Then consider that Clarence Thomas is a Supreme Court Justice. He's Black too, you know. He just happens to be a Conservative justice.
So when you consider that fact, your racism claim is moot.
The issue here is that Jackson is not an Original Constructionist, and is an activist judge. She stated both actually.