AwesomusPrime · 36-40, M
View 8 more replies »
AwesomusPrime · 36-40, M
@Kwek00
Whether liberals have any ideological reason to support Nazism is irrelevant. My point is that they clearly have a version of it they're willing to tolerate. We were told for years that Nazism was an unforgivable evil, right up until openly Nazi elements appeared on the 'correct' side of a conflict.
As for your observation about people I consider my enemies, I'd be interested to know who they are. I wasn't aware I'd announced any. Perhaps you've become so familiar with my motives that you've begun discovering intentions before I've had the opportunity to form them myself.
Liberals have no reasons to support NAZI's, they are the antithesis of liberalism. They alson don't "prefer" any NAZI over another NAZI. This just you over simplifying things, so you are not only able to understand an otherwise complex idea
Whether liberals have any ideological reason to support Nazism is irrelevant. My point is that they clearly have a version of it they're willing to tolerate. We were told for years that Nazism was an unforgivable evil, right up until openly Nazi elements appeared on the 'correct' side of a conflict.
but also allows you to antagonise people you consider your enemy.
As for your observation about people I consider my enemies, I'd be interested to know who they are. I wasn't aware I'd announced any. Perhaps you've become so familiar with my motives that you've begun discovering intentions before I've had the opportunity to form them myself.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@AwesomusPrime I'm glad Facebook is helping your bot out. I just wanted to know where the image was from, and it's just posted on Facebook, X and other social-media sites, by accounts with Russian signatures. So yeah... try again.
Yeah... if Ukraine isn't 100% pure and clean, it can't be supported. Every far-right wing organisation over there, needs to a reason for liberals to let the country be taken over by agressors. If that is the purity check liberals should follow, no country will ever be in anny liberal coalition... because none are 100% pure. But people like yourself, like to cherry pick to disqualify things because you obsess over purity when it's politically convenient.
It's clear who you are picking on... but that's okay, dishonesty was the reason why I started talking to you in first place.
My point is that they clearly have a version of it they're willing to tolerate. We were told for years that Nazism was an unforgivable evil, right up until openly Nazi elements appeared on the 'correct' side of a conflict.
Yeah... if Ukraine isn't 100% pure and clean, it can't be supported. Every far-right wing organisation over there, needs to a reason for liberals to let the country be taken over by agressors. If that is the purity check liberals should follow, no country will ever be in anny liberal coalition... because none are 100% pure. But people like yourself, like to cherry pick to disqualify things because you obsess over purity when it's politically convenient.
It's clear who you are picking on... but that's okay, dishonesty was the reason why I started talking to you in first place.
AwesomusPrime · 36-40, M
@Kwek00
You’re not really disputing the image, you’re trying to smother it in insinuation and then treat that as analysis. Reverse image results and reposting across social media don’t establish an image is fake or manipulated, that’s distribution, not provenance or verification.
If you actually had evidence the image is false or altered, you’d present it. Instead you’ve leaned on vague “Russian signature” framing and mockery, which isn’t a substitute for proof.
And “it’s on Facebook/X” doesn’t make something less credible any more than it makes it more credible. It’s irrelevant unless you can trace the original source or demonstrate manipulation. Otherwise you’re just projecting certainty onto uncertainty and hoping tone fills the gap left by evidence.
And that instinct to jump straight to “it must be rUssiAn propaganda” was you unwittingly proving the exact point you're apparently butthurt about.
Strawman.
Strawman.
That’s not a purity test argument. My point was about inconsistent application of the “Nazism is unforgivable” standard depending on which side of a conflict certain actors are on.
You’ve turned that into a general claim about ideological purity requirements, which isn’t what was said.
If you think my OP is dishonest, point out specifically what about it is false. Disagreeing with my conclusion is not the same as dishonesty.
. I'm glad Facebook is helping your bot out. I just wanted to know where the image was from, and it's just posted on Facebook, X and other social-media sites, by accounts with Russian signatures. So yeah... try again.
You’re not really disputing the image, you’re trying to smother it in insinuation and then treat that as analysis. Reverse image results and reposting across social media don’t establish an image is fake or manipulated, that’s distribution, not provenance or verification.
If you actually had evidence the image is false or altered, you’d present it. Instead you’ve leaned on vague “Russian signature” framing and mockery, which isn’t a substitute for proof.
And “it’s on Facebook/X” doesn’t make something less credible any more than it makes it more credible. It’s irrelevant unless you can trace the original source or demonstrate manipulation. Otherwise you’re just projecting certainty onto uncertainty and hoping tone fills the gap left by evidence.
And that instinct to jump straight to “it must be rUssiAn propaganda” was you unwittingly proving the exact point you're apparently butthurt about.
Yeah... if Ukraine isn't 100% pure and clean, it can't be supported.
Strawman.
Every far-right wing organisation over there, needs to a reason for liberals to let the country be taken over by agressors.
Strawman.
purity check liberals
That’s not a purity test argument. My point was about inconsistent application of the “Nazism is unforgivable” standard depending on which side of a conflict certain actors are on.
You’ve turned that into a general claim about ideological purity requirements, which isn’t what was said.
It's clear who you are picking on... but that's okay, dishonesty was the reason why I started talking to you in first place.
If you think my OP is dishonest, point out specifically what about it is false. Disagreeing with my conclusion is not the same as dishonesty.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@sunsporter1649 Still hooked on Branco's fantasies... he'll teach you what to think!
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Kwek00
Federal Grand Jury Charges Southern Poverty Law Center for Wire Fraud, False Statements, and Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering
A Grand Jury in Montgomery, Alabama, today returned an indictment charging the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) with 11 counts of wire fraud, false statements to a federally insured bank, and conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering. The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Alabama Northern Division filed two forfeiture actions to recover alleged proceeds of the organization’s fraud scheme. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigated this case with assistance from the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI).
“The SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. “Using donor money to allegedly profit off Klansmen cannot go unchecked. This Department of Justice will hold the SPLC and every other fraudulent organization operating with the same deceptive playbook accountable. No entity is above the law.”
“The SPLC allegedly engaged in a massive fraud operation to deceive their donors, enrich themselves, and hide their deceptive operations from the public," said FBI Director Kash Patel. "They lied to their donors, vowing to dismantle violent extremist groups, and actually turned around and paid the leaders of these very extremist groups - even utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes. That is illegal – and this is an ongoing investigation against all individuals involved.”
Federal Grand Jury Charges Southern Poverty Law Center for Wire Fraud, False Statements, and Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering
A Grand Jury in Montgomery, Alabama, today returned an indictment charging the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) with 11 counts of wire fraud, false statements to a federally insured bank, and conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering. The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Alabama Northern Division filed two forfeiture actions to recover alleged proceeds of the organization’s fraud scheme. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigated this case with assistance from the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI).
“The SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. “Using donor money to allegedly profit off Klansmen cannot go unchecked. This Department of Justice will hold the SPLC and every other fraudulent organization operating with the same deceptive playbook accountable. No entity is above the law.”
“The SPLC allegedly engaged in a massive fraud operation to deceive their donors, enrich themselves, and hide their deceptive operations from the public," said FBI Director Kash Patel. "They lied to their donors, vowing to dismantle violent extremist groups, and actually turned around and paid the leaders of these very extremist groups - even utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes. That is illegal – and this is an ongoing investigation against all individuals involved.”
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
I grew up in front of the TV, remember HOGAN'S HEROS? They're comical Nazis.
There's certainly no serious movement in Hollywood - they just like explosions.
There's certainly no serious movement in Hollywood - they just like explosions.
AbbeyRhode · F
The media, including movies, tv, and advertising is run by liberals, and they love murderous dictators. As is their custom, they accuse President Trump of being what they are, or support. If they truly believed he was Hitler, they'd worship him as a god.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment










