Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Fear and White Supremacy

White supremacy has been the GOP’s organizing principle for more than a half century. The “Great Replacement Theory” is the 21st century version of a historic trend. The Republican Party’s “Southern Strategy” successfully mobilized white Americans fearful of the Black movement for social justice into a formidable political bloc. Ronald Reagan’s ascendancy transformed the racist rhetoric within the Republican political establishment into a coded war on “welfare queens” and “crime.” The “Great Replacement Theory” is another iteration of white supremacist ideology which posits that Black Americans, immigrants, Muslims, and non-whites generally are invading the Anglo world in a bid to eradicate whites.

There is no doubt that the influence of far right and white supremacist ideology has played a role in the more than one hundred mass shootings that have occurred in the United States over the past several decades. A society organized to dehumanize and wage war on the masses is ultimately a society at war with itself. However, it is too simplistic to view white supremacy as a purely ideological phenomenon. White supremacy is not merely a set of ideas that, once spread, sets the stage for racist violence. This idealist conception of history strips white supremacy of its roots in the system of U.S. imperialism and simplifies its existence to a matter of moralistic virtue.

In most of the thinking and planning of whites in the West today, it’s easy to see that fear in their minds, conscious minds and subconscious minds, that the masses of dark people in the East, who already outnumber them, will continue to increase and multiply and grow until they eventually overrun the people of the West like a human sea, a human tide, a human flood. And the fear of this can be seen in the minds, and in the actions, of most of the people here in the West in practically everything that they do. It governs their political views, it governs their economic views and it governs most of their attitudes toward the present society.

Malcolm X related white fears of replacement not to some unexplainable hatred but to the material reality that white Americans and Westerners were quickly losing their ability to control the destinies of oppressed peoples of the world. Malcolm X’s words have only become more relevant in the current period. The rise of socialist China has precipitated a Cold War response from imperialism that has poured gasoline on the fire of anti-Asian racism and violence. The Black struggle for self-determination has faced a severe backlash from the U.S. mass incarceration state, opening the floodgates of racist reaction. White supremacy is a global system of social control that is directed at any person, government, or movement (Russian, Chinese, Black American, Muslim, Arab, etc.) that is perceived to threaten the domination of Euro-American imperialism.

The entire system of U.S. imperialism is thus implicated in racist violence. This includes the Democratic Party, which has for decades been wedded to a neoliberal model of governance reliant upon austerity, state repression, and war. The Republican Party is but the loudest and most ideologically influential political branch of the U.S.’s racist and imperialist system. The more that the U.S. finds itself bogged down in its own contradictions, the stronger the tide of racist reaction becomes. A true fight against white supremacy involves popular organization against the forces that gave it birth: the U.S. military state waging wars fueled by dehumanization, the two-party duopoly enacting policies that deprive oppressed people of their needs, and the economic system of capitalism robbing the earth of public wealth and ecological sustainability to enrich its corporate masters.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
graphite · 61-69, M
Bunch of nonsense. Which party is fanatic about abortion, which kills a disproportionate amount of black children?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Gloomy · F
@graphite What's your take on Republican Rep. David Eastman who argued fatal child abuse is a financial "benefit to society?
graphite · 61-69, M
@Gloomy Never heard of him. Doesn't sound like anything I'd ever agree with. We do know Democrats absolutely cherish abortion and pitch it as a great liberty to black women, for them to get rid of their babies.
Gloomy · F
@graphite To abort is an important option for all women to have.

Go cry somewhere else about the fact that abortions exist and happen.
graphite · 61-69, M
@Gloomy You right wingers don't give a shit about poor kids🤣

https://todayscatholic.org/the-many-ways-catholic-charities-serves-mothers-families/

Catholic Charities provides pro-life counseling for pregnant women who are unsure if they can successfully parent their unborn child. For these clients, the organization provides free, professional services through its masters-level therapists. If she decides to parent, Catholic Charities will wrap her in services to ensure the safety and wellbeing of mother and child. If she chooses adoption, it is a licensed child-placing agency that can help her facilitate the entire process.

...Just one of many Christian charities helping the poor.
Gloomy · F
@graphite There can be left leaning catholics, which is weird but they exist and it's problematic to mix religion with providing any service it always comes across as missionary work.

Also charity is a sign of a failing society
Heartlander · 80-89, M
@Gloomy :) leftist believe that if you have money or effort to expend on charity that money and effort belongs to the state and should never have been given to you in the first place. Also, we as individuals should not have the privilege to decide who is in need of charity. Only the state has that right.
Gloomy · F
@Heartlander No leftist believe that people deserve the fruits of their labor without a capitalist class that merely owns the means of production to accumulate insane amounts of wealth.

and yes there should be a system that does redistribute wealth into infrastructure, healthcare, social services, etc... that improves society for everyone.
In this way there would be no people who need charity in the first place and charity means people or organisations are at wealthier peoples mercy.

Like to a certain extend european society has already done a better job than the US when it comes to that.
Also a state is an organising tool it depends in which framework and under which ideology and with how much democratic control it operates.

The right wing talking point "state bad" is intellectually lazy and is built on a false premise and cold war propaganda.
graphite · 61-69, M
@Heartlander The state is supposed to be in charge of absolutely everything under failed Marxist doctrine. Liberty be damned. Marxism is a philosophy of failure, whining, and jealousy. That's why it's never worked.
Gloomy · F
@graphite Someone watched pragerU 😂 Are European countries marxist? Scandinavian countries?

Economic Libertarianism ends in monopolisation and the destruction of social cohesion and the end of workers rights.
Your lack of education is showing again.