The best evidence against intelligent design of life is the fact that we pewp.

When your design process isn't bound to any limitations whatsoever, why would anyone choose to make something that only utilizes half of its food and turns the rest of it into smelly waste that causes all kinds of diseases? 🤷

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

FoxyQueen · 51-55, F

And that we need air, sleep, food, and water to survive. Intelligent design would immediately see the limitations of these things and make them unnecessary.

I have always said, " Sand/dirt doesn't need what we need to survive. How are we made of sand if we don't exist like sand/dirt?"

NerdyPotato ·

@FoxyQueen that's another great point 👍