Objections to Evolution

Do you object to evolution and if so why? This isn't a thread about evolution, it's a thread about objection to evolution. It doesn't matter what evolution teaches, only why you object to it, if that is the case. Or perhaps why you don't.

Also see https://similarworlds.com/evolution/4549883-Objections-to-Creationism-Do-you-object-to

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@BibleData [quote]how science can be abused[/quote]

Science isn’t abused.

Scientific knowledge can be abused... but that’s a societal choice.

“What do you think science is? There's nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. Which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?”
[i]Steven Novella[/i]

BibleData · M

@newjaninev2 [quote]Science isn’t abused.[/quote]

Science [b]IS[/b] abused. And science also fights abuse. When I think about the Plandemic I listen to people who were respected scientists. Epidemiologists, molecular biologists, virologists, practicing medical doctors. I don't listen to me or to you. I listen to Judy Mikovits tell how her colleague, Anthony Fuaci horribly abused science killing millions since the 1980s. I listen to Fauci's side and I believe Mikovits.

Now, her career was destroyed. She was destroyed for defending scientific integrity. By Fauci and others. I know how it was done. I've seen the evidence. I've read her story. I believe her. You probably don't. You would dismiss her as "conspiracy nut" because you put all of your faith in "science."

It's a religion. Science is your God.

"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@BibleData Science has no authorities.

None

(including Carl Sagan)

[quote]put all of your faith in "science.”[/quote]

No, I follow the evidence. I use scientific methodology to ask the universe questions, and to know how much confidence I can have in the answers.

BibleData · M

@newjaninev2 You don't get it. I don't trust Carl Sagan. I don't trust Dr. Robert Malone. I don't trust Isaac Newton or Darwin. I don't trust Dawkins. I don't trust you. I don't trust me. [b]I don't trust people.[/b]

The only thing I can do to appease you is repeat what you say. Follow your evidence. Which you got from someone else like I did mine. There's nothing you can say to appease me.

Can you understand that? It's very simple.

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@BibleData You forgot Judy Mikovits

I obtain my own evidence, or obtain evidence previously used by others, but only to check the veracity of that evidence.

The motto of the Royal Society is: [i]nullius in verba[/i] ... 'take nobody's word for it'.

Yet flakes with websites command unquestioning acceptance... a willing suspension of disbelief... so that the mark can feel important, and privy to ‘information’ available to nobody else.

The site owner’s bank balance grows proportionally to the ego of the mark.

’twas always so

BibleData · M

@newjaninev2 [quote]You forgot Judy Mikovits[/quote]

I trust Judy. I don't always agree with Judy and I don't think she is infallible, but when it comes to integrity she is right up there at the top of the list of anyone else I can think of. An extremely rare gem.

[sep]

'twas always so. Indeed. Jesus said the world [kosmos] was founded on the blood of Abel.