Science is always changing but the Bible stays the same.
This is something i often hear about science when it contradicts a specific interpretation of the Bible and is deployed as a criticism as if it is a weakness rather than a strength.
Can someone who feels this way explain to me why it is a BAD thing to change one's position on the basis of new evidence and a GOOD thing to hold to a position despite contradictory evidence?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Which version of the Bible -- there are a number, not to mention all the various translations or each version and changes in those translations over the years.
