Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

If live in Venezuela, is it safe to go out in a speed boat, without being shot at by America, because they want your oil ?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
HobNoblin · 36-40, M
Go ahead and load up your little boat and take off. See what happens.
swirlie · 31-35
@HobNoblin
What the US government is the modern day gestapo. Remember what happened the last time someone had the gestapo do his dirty work for him?

If your good buddy Trump keeps this up, you too will see what happens.
@swirlie Do you even live in the United States?
swirlie · 31-35
@MsSwan
Sometimes, why?
@HobNoblin Lol, who downvoted?
HobNoblin · 36-40, M
@swirlie Back to Nazis again? I'm not worried, I don't smuggle lethal drugs into the US.
swirlie · 31-35
@HobNoblin
You just buy them when they get there, right?
HobNoblin · 36-40, M
@swirlie I've never used drugs even once in my life. I don't drink I don't smoke pot. I abstain from women as well and chose to seek the truth in life instead.
swirlie · 31-35
@HobNoblin
I did all those things too, though I never did use drugs, nor did I ever drink alcohol nor did I ever become intimate with a female, so you and I have a lot in common after all!
HobNoblin · 36-40, M
@swirlie You're not supposed to be intimate with females.
swirlie · 31-35
@HobNoblin
Is that what your catholic church told you?
HobNoblin · 36-40, M
@swirlie I'm an atheist, that's what common sense tells me.
swirlie · 31-35
@HobNoblin
Why would you call it common sense? Why would you use that rationale for saying females are not suppose to be intimate with other females?
HobNoblin · 36-40, M
@swirlie It should be obvious to anyone. Obviously the parts didn't evolved for that. Sex and the sexual drive evolved for the purpose of reproduction as is easily seen in nature. The only way two females are "intimate" is if something has gone wrong.
swirlie · 31-35
@HobNoblin
But why would you think that two people regardless of their gender, are getting intimate with each other for the purpose of reproduction, even if they're a male and a female?

Were you taught that two people have sexual intercourse with each other only for the exclusive purpose of conceiving a child?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
swirlie · 31-35
@HobNoblin
Okay, I hear your argument, but what business is it of our's if two women become intimate with each other?

The USA has a President who appears to be heterosexual but who obviously is suffering from some kind of mental disorder, yet MAGA Republicans have nothing to say about that but they have a lot to say about two women who desire intimacy with each other. Explain that one to me.
HobNoblin · 36-40, M
@swirlie The problem I have with it is we're lying to ourselves about it. It isn't normal, it isn't healthy and it isn't good for anyone involved. We should be honest about disease and defect and we should be acting accordingly.
swirlie · 31-35
@HobNoblin
1) When you say "we" are lying to ourselves about it, who is "we"?

2) When you say "It isn't normal", it isn't normal according to who?

3) When you say "It isn't healthy", it isn't healthy according to who?

4) When you say "It isn't good for anyone involved", it isn't good for anyone involved according to who?

5) When you say "we should be honest about disease and defect", who is your source who classified two women who are being intimate with each other as having a disease or a defect?

I would like to know who your source is who taught you all these things HobNoblin, except this time you can't say "common sense" because we've established that your perspective of "common sense" doesn't fly anymore.

For a guy who claims to be an atheist, you sure sound like an evangelical christian to me.

Go ahead and answer my 5 questions as honestly as you can.
HobNoblin · 36-40, M
@swirlie

1: We is Society, western society particularly. We're pretending it's acceptable and no different than between a man and a woman. That's obviously not true

2: It isn't normal as in it contravenes the entire evolved purpose of sex.

3: It isn't healthy to anyone who looks at it honestly. It cannot produce offspring, see above.

4: It isn't good for anyone as in it isn't good for those who suffer from the condition and it definitely isn't good for anyone else because now you have something dysfunctional and disgusting going on in your civilization. For instance just imagine a pretty young girl in high school or working at a job. A deviant and degenerate woman finds her attractive, keeps looking at her lusting after her the way a man would do. Worse yet now you have degenerates hitting on young women who now have to endure something unthinkable.

5: We certainly should be honest about disease and defect as it is harmful to our civilization. As to my source I reasoned it out just by looking honestly at what was going on. If you must have further sources many governments recognize it as a defect. In some places it is punishable by death. We once recognized it as a defect here in the US Russia still does.


As to who taught me these things I just took one look and it was obvious. Just look at the depravity of it, how disgusting it is. Look at the physical damage it does rectal prolapse, AIDS "gay bowel syndrome" It's as filthy as it looks. I assessed it honestly instead of the way other people want me to. "except this time you can't say "common sense" because we've established that your perspective of "common sense" doesn't fly anymore". Who is this "we" who established this? It's news to me. Also, yes I am an atheist what Christian would try to lie and claim to be an atheist? It would fly right in the face of his religion.