Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Shout out to JD Vance. That is leadership. A stark contrast from Kamala Harris.

I'm probably not going to vote for him in 2028 but I like the way he handled himself. The way he backed his commander-in-chief and told Zelensky directly to his face what many of us have been saying for 3 years.

He was concise and to the point. And what is sickening is how The Left is backing Zelensky who came here to our country and tried to disrespect our President in front of the Nation. After all we have done for Ukraine? We were literally the only country who supported them in the beginning. We put ourselves at risk of a nuclear war. We almost died because of Zelensky and senile Biden. Trump should have had him locked up.
Top | New | Old

You, and Putin, seem to be forgetting a three-way treaty known as the 1994 Budapest Memorandum.

Essentially, Ukraine agreed to give up all its nuclear weapons to Russia in exchange for safety from a U.S. or Russian invasion. Russia's invasion of Ukraine violates that treaty. And as a signatory to that 1994 Budapest Memorandum, the U.S. has a definite interest in righting Putin's current wrongs.

In the final version of the deal, Russia promised not to attack Ukraine. While the U.S. and the U.K. assured Ukraine they would aid if it was attacked by Russia, that promised aid did not guarantee military support like a NATO country would receive.

In 2009, Russia and the U.S. announced that the assurances in the Budapest Memorandum would continue to remain in effect in the future.
https://www.verifythis.com/article/news/verify/global-conflicts/ukraine-agreed-to-give-up-nukes-in-exchange-for-safety-from-russia-invasion-attack-budapest-memorandum-treaty/536-8748a51f-10ee-47f0-be30-b4088750ee44

Russia promised specifically NOT to invade Ukraine, and the U.S. promised specifically to ASSIST Ukraine if the treaty were ever violated. And that's what the U.S. had been doing while we had a real leader.

But now we have

come2gether · 46-50, M
Then why wouldn't you vote for him? That doesn't make sense. If you're proud of how he does his job, and stands up for America... why not give him your vote?
Jokersswild · 22-25VIP
@come2gether Depends on who is running against him...

I like how he handled the situation. I don't like how they're cutting out medicaid and social programs for the poor.
come2gether · 46-50, M
@Jokersswild that isn't actually what's happening. They are going to cull the able bodies from Medicaid, and they should. They aren't going to cut off people who actually need it.
come2gether · 46-50, M
@Jokersswild for your reference:

House Speaker Mike Johnson, on X, formerly Twitter: "Medicaid is for single mothers with small children who are just trying to make it. It's not for 29-year-old males sitting on their couch playing video games. We're going to find those guys, and we will SEND them back to work!"1 day ago
MrAverage1965 · 61-69, M
[@EvaS02 So concise and too the point is all that matters, the lies don't make a difference.

By the way the US disrespected itself when they elected Trump a man with a criminal history.
How can one "disrespect" a criminal who already tried to to blackmail Zelensky in 2020 by threatening to withhold promised aid unless he investigated Trump’s political opponents. Trump deserves nothing but a prison cell and the rest of the world knows it.

Trump is the convicted criminal here, and don’t forget it.
seaglass · F
Made Trump look weak af 😅
WintaTheAngle · 41-45, M
Ofcourse Vance would take issue with conscription in the Ukraine.

His boss is a draft dodger.

 
Post Comment