This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Pinkstarburst · F
I don’t think satire is appropriate in this instance.
OliRos · 22-25, F
@Pinkstarburst Satire?
Pinkstarburst · F
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Pinkstarburst It's not aimed at the victims. The opposite
OliRos · 22-25, F
@Pinkstarburst Satire may be the aim but it is not satirical. There may be a certain amount of provocative irony in the original post.
But the question is valid and worthy of consideration, as my response demonstrates.
But the question is valid and worthy of consideration, as my response demonstrates.
Pinkstarburst · F
@OliRos There’s no validity to the question. If someone has to ask if a human life has a soul they should question THEIR validity.
OliRos · 22-25, F
@Pinkstarburst The question was, does a human shield have a soul.
The discussion is about the constitution of a human shield and whether or not the individual souls can combine to form a collective soul.
There is no justification of the use of human shields.
The discussion is about the constitution of a human shield and whether or not the individual souls can combine to form a collective soul.
There is no justification of the use of human shields.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Pinkstarburst Sigh. What is implied is that the people in favour of the Israeli bombing campaign dehumanise people by calling them human shields
You've read my reply to sara and you know what my intent is.
You've read my reply to sara and you know what my intent is.