This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
strait46 · 46-50, M
about tunnels, certainly they justify destroying the tunnel so it won't used for war. necessary to save lives. since that is the target it must be done. even in a hospital.
you just want the terrorist to have time to come up and shoot some more jews. pathetic.
you just want the terrorist to have time to come up and shoot some more jews. pathetic.
NerdyPotato · M
@strait46 destroying the tunnels is a good way to fight Hamas indeed. Bombing a hospital or supporting that by definition puts you on the wrong side of history, especially after suggesting that perfectly fine alternative.
No, I don't want Hamas to have time to kill more Jewish civilians. I just think actively supporting the killing of Muslim civilians makes one equally bad and brings us nowhere closer to a solution.
No, I don't want Hamas to have time to kill more Jewish civilians. I just think actively supporting the killing of Muslim civilians makes one equally bad and brings us nowhere closer to a solution.
strait46 · 46-50, M
@NerdyPotato that depends if a hospital is used for "more" than healing, for battle, it is a legitimate target. if a mosque is used for battle it is a legitimate target. some tunnels are IN hospital so necessary to bomb the hospital.
but you say "bomb hospital" you echo the refuted news report, for which they apolgized for error, when satelite showed the hammas rocket hit the hospital
but you say "bomb hospital" you echo the refuted news report, for which they apolgized for error, when satelite showed the hammas rocket hit the hospital
NerdyPotato · M
@strait46 surely there are ways to target Hamas more directly with the best intelligence technology in the world. The hospital attack may not have come from Israel, but many residential areas have been flattened by them, including in Libia where Hamas doesn't operate. What's your excuse for that?