KunsanVeteran · M
U-235 must be enriched to at least 90% to be considered “weaponized Uranium”.
If you all wish to debate how close Iran was to having their own fission nuclear devices, here’s a website that can keep you busy for quite a while. But, personally, I wouldn’t believe anything coming out of the tRUMP misadministration especially if Hegseth says it.
https://science.howstuffworks.com/nuclear-bomb.htm
If you all wish to debate how close Iran was to having their own fission nuclear devices, here’s a website that can keep you busy for quite a while. But, personally, I wouldn’t believe anything coming out of the tRUMP misadministration especially if Hegseth says it.
https://science.howstuffworks.com/nuclear-bomb.htm
No bomb. Netanyahu has wanted to wage a war against Iran forever but because of the terrain he's always needed the US to help. No other President has ever been conned by BB.
View 9 more replies »
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@ArtieKat lolz. Posts here? I remember learning about how the USA assassinated The Iranian president in 1953, and the leader Nasser from Egypt - because they wanted to use their oil for their people and said so! That's socialism and the UK and USA populations accept murders of socialists! And y'all as really never stopped!
Try professor Sayed Marandi.
Try professor Sayed Marandi.
ArtieKat · M
Perhaps you can explain what Iran was doing with uranium enriched to more than 6 times the requirement for electric power etc? Or did the UN inspectors lie? 🤔
@justanothername
@justanothername
ArtieKat · M
@justanothername If "he" is supposed to be me.... I have no political affiliations to left or right. I'm an educated ageing English gentleman, taught to think for myself. But I notice that neither of you has answered my question of what you think Iran was doing with 60% enriched uranium.
KunsanVeteran · M
justanothername · 51-55, M
@ArtieKat Supposed “intellect” and “neutral political affiliation” is meaningless when you base your accusations on unsupported claims.
KunsanVeteran · M
It’s not NUclear…
It’s UNclear!
It’s UNclear!
Convivial · 26-30, F
Successful lies are repeated...
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
StygianKohlrabi · M
incompetence
but not on the US or Israeli side
but not on the US or Israeli side