Top | Newest First | Oldest First
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
I don’t think there will be any resolution to the question unless and until both humans are treated with equal dignity and respect.
View 6 more replies »
@MarthannBann888 [quote]What’s the matter, corv? Did I get to you?[/quote]
Ah, the call of the internet troll.
[quote]You know as well as I that you are making up reality just like you do on everyone else.[/quote]
Talking to yourself in the second person again? You should really reserve that for when you stand in the mirror.
I would respond to the rest of your comment, but the only response it deserves would cause you to have an aneurysm.
Ah, the call of the internet troll.
[quote]You know as well as I that you are making up reality just like you do on everyone else.[/quote]
Talking to yourself in the second person again? You should really reserve that for when you stand in the mirror.
I would respond to the rest of your comment, but the only response it deserves would cause you to have an aneurysm.
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
@CorvusBlackthorne
You are calling me more names! Smoke screen for your real mission of confounding real issues for the purpose of obscuring the consequences, real consequences, of our actions. Current law favors survival of the mother if both cannot be saved. These decisions are painful, but in comparison to 60,000,000 aborted babies it seems a small number. Any person can only justify their their support of abortion by means negating the personhood of the fetus. However, the reality of the baby’s beating heart stands in stark contradiction to any that he or she is not alive and developing as a person.
You are calling me more names! Smoke screen for your real mission of confounding real issues for the purpose of obscuring the consequences, real consequences, of our actions. Current law favors survival of the mother if both cannot be saved. These decisions are painful, but in comparison to 60,000,000 aborted babies it seems a small number. Any person can only justify their their support of abortion by means negating the personhood of the fetus. However, the reality of the baby’s beating heart stands in stark contradiction to any that he or she is not alive and developing as a person.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
@CorvusBlackthorne
You know nothing of the sort. What do you think you are, a mind reader? It is you that has made this an either or question. It looks like what you want is to kill babies and will use any excuse to do so. You make no effort to save the babies. Just rip them apart and tear them out of their moms. In contrast, the Christian movement is opening homes and making adoption arrangements so couples who cannot have children can adopt. What do I admire, a movement bent on destruction and too lazy to make any other arrangements, or a movement trying to do the best for both mother and child?
You know nothing of the sort. What do you think you are, a mind reader? It is you that has made this an either or question. It looks like what you want is to kill babies and will use any excuse to do so. You make no effort to save the babies. Just rip them apart and tear them out of their moms. In contrast, the Christian movement is opening homes and making adoption arrangements so couples who cannot have children can adopt. What do I admire, a movement bent on destruction and too lazy to make any other arrangements, or a movement trying to do the best for both mother and child?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
pdxlinux · 41-45, M
@MarthannBann888 you tried to change the subject.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment