This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Mcmarie90 · 31-35, F
Why do you post in conservative? Every conservative knows both impeachments were shams.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@Mcmarie90 So, what I'm hearing is you guys know a lot of things that aren't true.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
KunsanVeteran · M
@LordShadowfire critical thinking skills are sadly lacking amongst Twice Impeached’s groupies
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Mcmarie90 · 31-35, F
@LordShadowfire
He was aquited, and name the law. Impeach doesnt mean it was illegal. Seperate processes. This is all about campaign finance laws and everyone forgets that Biden was losing in the primaries at the time. No one even knew he'd be the opponent in the general. Absolute arguments that he broke the law are impossible to claim.
Speaking of election interference, how about that Hunter laptop, huh? The one the Bidens got big tech to censor right before the election, that has evidence of the big guy?
You mean the Trump tower he wanted to build there in 1987?
Or he signed a contract for in 2005?
Or that he tweeted about in 2013?
The guy was never supposed to win, and he wanted a real estate deal in Russia. Notice all those dates? Those were before he ran for president. Your not convincing anyone (who has made up their mind) of any wrong doing. You're just virtue signaling your TDS to the same handful of people over and over again.
He was aquited, and name the law. Impeach doesnt mean it was illegal. Seperate processes. This is all about campaign finance laws and everyone forgets that Biden was losing in the primaries at the time. No one even knew he'd be the opponent in the general. Absolute arguments that he broke the law are impossible to claim.
Speaking of election interference, how about that Hunter laptop, huh? The one the Bidens got big tech to censor right before the election, that has evidence of the big guy?
You mean the Trump tower he wanted to build there in 1987?
Or he signed a contract for in 2005?
Or that he tweeted about in 2013?
The guy was never supposed to win, and he wanted a real estate deal in Russia. Notice all those dates? Those were before he ran for president. Your not convincing anyone (who has made up their mind) of any wrong doing. You're just virtue signaling your TDS to the same handful of people over and over again.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@Mcmarie90
He was acquitted...
Fixed your spelling for you. And no, technically, he wasn't acquitted. Is not meant to determine guilt or innocence. It is simply an attempt to see if there is enough evidence to proceed with a criminal trial. Do you really not know how the justice system works in the country where you were born and raised?...name the law.
Gee, I don't know, how about the Espionage Act? He was literally trying to get a foreign government to interfere in our elections.Speaking of election interference, how about that Hunter laptop, huh?
Oh, you mean the laptop that was in the custody of the Department of Justice while Trump was president, and had all the "best people" working for him? Funny how they didn't find enough evidence to prosecute Hunter back then, isn't it?You mean the Trump tower he wanted to build there in 1987?
Or he signed a contract for in 2005?
Or that he tweeted about in 2013?
Yeah, that one. He still wanted to build it, but the Russian government was dicking him around. There was an email, which I'm sure you'd love to ignore, from his campaign manager to somebody in the Russian government, talking about what it would take to get that contract pushed through after all these years. Then suddenly he was elected president. Interesting, no?Or he signed a contract for in 2005?
Or that he tweeted about in 2013?
You're not convincing anyone (who has made up their mind) of any wrongdoing.
Fixed your spelling again. And I realize I'm not going to convince you of anything. Your mind is set, just like concrete. But if there's anybody out there who hasn't shut their mind tight to the possibility, maybe this will convince them.You're just telling the truth.
Fixed your spelling one last time.
Mcmarie90 · 31-35, F
@LordShadowfire thanks for fixin me speling. It reely speeks to how much I care for dis thread.
I was talking about impeachment, which is what you started the thread with. Why do you feel the need to change the subject everytime someone disagrees with you?
I think it's cute you still think he was put in place by Russia though.
I was talking about impeachment, which is what you started the thread with. Why do you feel the need to change the subject everytime someone disagrees with you?
I think it's cute you still think he was put in place by Russia though.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@Mcmarie90 I didn't change the subject. I just said that an impeachment is not the same thing as a criminal trial. It's a hearing to determine whether or not a sitting or former president has enough evidence against him or her to go ahead with a criminal proceeding. Thanks for letting everybody know you're not smart enough to follow along.
Mcmarie90 · 31-35, F
@LordShadowfire Your subject literally starts with the words "Twice impeached" to which I replied back:
Who isn't smart? You sound vaccinated.
Why do you post in conservative? Every conservative knows both impeachments were shams.
Who isn't smart? You sound vaccinated.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@Mcmarie90 Look closer. I didn't start this subject. Unless you think @KunsanVeteran is my alt.
Who isn't smart? You sound vaccinated.
How in the sweet seven-layer fuck with a cherry on top does somebody "sound vaccinated"?
Mcmarie90 · 31-35, F
@LordShadowfire you got me, it was someone else who started it, and then I commented on the impeachment part.
"The subject of the thread literally starts with"
"The subject of the thread literally starts with"